W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tt@w3.org > January 2015

Re: IMSC1 Test Suite update + proposed request to DECE

From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 18:31:23 +0100
Message-ID: <54CA6E6B.50700@w3.org>
To: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com>
CC: "public-tt@w3.org" <public-tt@w3.org>
Pierre ,
Thanks you very much for your clarification.
This sounds great.

Best,

thierry

On 29/01/2015 18:23, Pierre-Anthony Lemieux wrote:
> Hi Thierry,
>
>> Could you explain a bit more what was the methodology for listing
>> all these features from IMSC1 and target the necessary associated tests ?
>
> As briefly mentioned during the call, I have looked at extensions
> defined by IMSC1 (see Annex F) (they are all mandatory), as well as
> input received so far.
>
>> Could we list the available IMSC1 implementation (public or not), to forecast the implemntation report.
>
> I had personally been waiting until the test suite was substantially
> complete before following-up with folks that had expressed interest in
> contributing test results. I plan to go ahead now, and encourage
> others to do so as well.
>
> Let me know if you need additional information.
>
> Best,
>
> -- Pierre
>
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 12:44 AM, Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org> wrote:
>> Pierre,
>>
>> Thanks for adding test cases for IMSC1 with the intent of covering
>> all features introduced by IMSC1 (not already present in TTML1)
>>
>>
>> Could you explain a bit more what was the methodology for listing all these
>> features from IMSC1 and target the necessary associated tests ?
>>
>>
>> Could we list the available IMSC1 implementation (public or not), to
>> forecast the implemntation report.
>>
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> thierry.
>>
>>
>> On 29/01/2015 02:48, Pierre-Anthony Lemieux wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I have added  test cases for IMSC1 [1], with the intent of covering
>>> all features introduced by IMSC1.
>>>
>>> [1] https://www.w3.org/wiki/TimedText/IMSC1_Implementation_Report
>>>
>>> As suggested earlier, it would be good to have more details on the
>>> test cases provided by DECE, e.g. it looks like
>>> Solekai022_854_29_640x75_MaxSdSubtitle_v7_subtitles might be
>>> exercising the limits of the HRM. I recommend composing a brief
>>> liaison to DECE requesting additional details.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> -- Pierre
>>>
>>
Received on Thursday, 29 January 2015 17:31:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 5 October 2017 18:24:20 UTC