RE: proposed updated response to MPEG on codecs

Thanks for fixes.   I assume Dave will update before posting.

 

As for the your second point, I am not sure that I follow.  We must define the new media type parameter formally in TTML2 or our decisions and this communication are meaningless.  Is your point that we did not agree as a group to register the update with IANA?  I agree, but I also did not say that to MPEG (although I personally think we should).

 

                Mike

 

From: Nigel Megitt [mailto:nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk] 
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2014 8:39 AM
To: Michael Dolan; 'Timed Text Working Group'
Subject: Re: proposed updated response to MPEG on codecs

 

Thanks for the quick turnaround Mike. 3 things:

 

typo: s/medaType/mediaType

correction: s/procProfile/processorProfiles

 

Query: do we want the sentence "Its parameters will be extended in TTML2 to include the proposed syntax above." ? Unless we're changing the IANA registration then I do not think we have agreed to do this.

 

Kind regards,

 

Nigel

 

 

From: Michael Dolan <mdolan@newtbt.com>
Date: Thursday, 16 October 2014 16:29
To: 'Timed Text Working Group' <public-tt@w3.org>
Subject: proposed updated response to MPEG on codecs
Resent-From: <public-tt@w3.org>
Resent-Date: Thursday, 16 October 2014 16:30

 

Per my action item from today, please see the attached.

 

Over to Dave and Nigel for review to see if I captured where we ended up in today’s call; then over to Dave to upload to MPEG (or I can if needed).

 

Time is very short and should be posted Sunday morning CEDT.

 

Regards,

 

                Mike

 

Michael A DOLAN

TBT, Inc.  PO Box 190

Del Mar, CA 92014

(m) +1-858-882-7497

mdolan@newtbt.com