- From: Michael Dolan <mdolan@newtbt.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 04:34:41 -0700
- To: "'Timed Text Working Group'" <public-tt@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <001701cf8632$4f3390e0$ed9ab2a0$@newtbt.com>
They are not the same. forcedDisplayMode text is embedded in a single document since otherwise a decoder would have *simultaneously* decode two documents (one with forced content and one with non-forced content) and merge the output over the visual object. The desire to force the image profile to contain alternate text is solved with a text profile document. Only one or the other document is decoded and presented since they each produce substantively the same visual results. And, even if it is desirable to decode both simultaneously, they would not have to be merged onto the visual object. Regards, Mike From: Nigel Megitt [mailto:nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk] Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2014 4:10 AM To: 'Timed Text Working Group' Subject: Re: ISSUE-309 (Image profile fails WCAG 1.2): Image profile needs to permit text equivalent [TTML IMSC 1.0] I've updated this issue with the following note: The proposed resolution to this is not consistent with the approach taken for forcedDisplay (see also <https://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/312> Issue-312). In the latter case it is stated that the two types of content must be provided in the same document. In this case it is stated that the content provider may optionally provide multiple documents. A simple resolution to this would be to permit text to be included in the image profile. Nigel
Received on Thursday, 12 June 2014 11:35:18 UTC