Re: ACTION-318: Draft note wording for imsc conformance

See https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ttml/rev/71dbbdd1a9f1 .

Best,

-- Pierre

On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk> wrote:
> Your note wording is:
>
> "The use of the terms presentation processor (transformation processor) do
> not imply conformance to the DFXP Transformation Profile (DFXP
> Transformation Profile) specified in [TTML1]. In other words, it is not
> considered an error for a presentation processor (transformation
> processor) to conform to a profile defined in this specification without
> also conforming to the DFXP Transformation Profile (DFXP Transformation
> Profile)."
>
> I suggest adding "within this document" before "do not imply" to make
> clear that this note is not a gloss on TTML 1 SE but is a clarification of
> IMSC.
>
> Also there's a typo in the last sentence - I think you means "DFXP
> Presentation Profile (DFXP Transformation Profile)."
>
> Other than that, looks good to me (and less wordy than my proposal),
>
> Nigel
>
>
> On 02/08/2014 09:34, "Pierre-Anthony Lemieux" <pal@sandflow.com> wrote:
>
>>Addressed at
>>https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ttml/diff/dffe001fa4c8/ttml-ww-profiles/ttml-ww-pro
>>files.source.html
>>
>>On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote:
>>> I mean all of 3.2.1.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 01/08/2014 15:46, "Glenn Adams" <glenn@skynav.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Seems a bit wordy, but OK.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yeah I tried to go for accuracy and got verbosity as an added
>>>>'feature'.
>>>>
>>>> > It would probably be good to require an IMSC processor to satisfy the
>>>> > generic processor conformance rules of TTML.
>>>>
>>>> You mean bullets 1, 2 and 3 of Section 3.2.1 in TTML 1 SE? I think
>>>>bullets
>>>> 4 and 5 are already covered.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 7:19 AM, Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> As discussed yesterday, I propose the following wording for a
>>>>> non-normative note to be added to section 3. Conformance of IMSC:
>>>>>
>>>>> <--
>>>>> NOTE
>>>>> The terms Presentation Processor and Transformation Processor are
>>>>>defined
>>>>> by [TTML1] in general terms and more specifically with requirements
>>>>>for
>>>>> conformance with reference to the DFXP Presentation Profile and
>>>>> Transformation Profile. The use of those terms in this document does
>>>>>not
>>>>> imply that conformance to both the profiles defined herein and the
>>>>>relevant
>>>>> DFXP profile is required. It is not considered an error for a
>>>>>processor to
>>>>> be a conformant presentation processor or transformation processor in
>>>>>the
>>>>> context of this document without being a conformant TTML presentation
>>>>> processor or transformation processor.
>>>>> -->
>>>>>
>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Nigel
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>

Received on Monday, 4 August 2014 15:28:39 UTC