- From: Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2014 10:37:21 +0000
- To: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com>, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- CC: Timed Text Working Group <public-tt@w3.org>
Your note wording is: "The use of the terms presentation processor (transformation processor) do not imply conformance to the DFXP Transformation Profile (DFXP Transformation Profile) specified in [TTML1]. In other words, it is not considered an error for a presentation processor (transformation processor) to conform to a profile defined in this specification without also conforming to the DFXP Transformation Profile (DFXP Transformation Profile)." I suggest adding "within this document" before "do not imply" to make clear that this note is not a gloss on TTML 1 SE but is a clarification of IMSC. Also there's a typo in the last sentence - I think you means "DFXP Presentation Profile (DFXP Transformation Profile)." Other than that, looks good to me (and less wordy than my proposal), Nigel On 02/08/2014 09:34, "Pierre-Anthony Lemieux" <pal@sandflow.com> wrote: >Addressed at >https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ttml/diff/dffe001fa4c8/ttml-ww-profiles/ttml-ww-pro >files.source.html > >On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote: >> I mean all of 3.2.1. >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk> >>wrote: >>> >>> On 01/08/2014 15:46, "Glenn Adams" <glenn@skynav.com> wrote: >>> >>> Seems a bit wordy, but OK. >>> >>> >>> Yeah I tried to go for accuracy and got verbosity as an added >>>'feature'. >>> >>> > It would probably be good to require an IMSC processor to satisfy the >>> > generic processor conformance rules of TTML. >>> >>> You mean bullets 1, 2 and 3 of Section 3.2.1 in TTML 1 SE? I think >>>bullets >>> 4 and 5 are already covered. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 7:19 AM, Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> As discussed yesterday, I propose the following wording for a >>>> non-normative note to be added to section 3. Conformance of IMSC: >>>> >>>> <-- >>>> NOTE >>>> The terms Presentation Processor and Transformation Processor are >>>>defined >>>> by [TTML1] in general terms and more specifically with requirements >>>>for >>>> conformance with reference to the DFXP Presentation Profile and >>>> Transformation Profile. The use of those terms in this document does >>>>not >>>> imply that conformance to both the profiles defined herein and the >>>>relevant >>>> DFXP profile is required. It is not considered an error for a >>>>processor to >>>> be a conformant presentation processor or transformation processor in >>>>the >>>> context of this document without being a conformant TTML presentation >>>> processor or transformation processor. >>>> --> >>>> >>>> Kind regards, >>>> >>>> Nigel >>>> >>>> >>> >>
Received on Monday, 4 August 2014 10:38:07 UTC