- From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 09:52:50 +0800
- To: "Monica Martin (MS OPEN TECH)" <momartin@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Timed Text Working Group <public-tt@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 25 September 2012 01:55:34 UTC
I will change both of the shall to must to be consistent. TTML10 always uses must. On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 3:01 AM, Monica Martin (MS OPEN TECH) < momartin@microsoft.com> wrote: > Comments: There are only 2 instances where SHALL is used instead of MUST. > One is a further description of an existing mandatory (MUST) requirement, > R0006. R0006 could remain as is. > > Proposal: Revise R0047 to use MUST. > > Monica > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Timed Text Working Group Issue Tracker [mailto:sysbot+tracker@w3.org > ] > Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 11:54 PM > To: public-tt@w3.org > Subject: ISSUE-186: confusion about SHALL vs MUST [Simple Delivery Profile > for Closed Captions] > > ISSUE-186: confusion about SHALL vs MUST [Simple Delivery Profile for > Closed Captions] > > http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/186 > > Raised by: Glenn Adams > On product: Simple Delivery Profile for Closed Captions > > SDP-US uses both SHALL and MUST in an arbitrary fashion; need to choose > one and stick with it > > > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 25 September 2012 01:55:34 UTC