W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tt@w3.org > September 2012

Re: ISSUE-186: confusion about SHALL vs MUST [Simple Delivery Profile for Closed Captions]

From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 09:52:50 +0800
Message-ID: <CACQ=j+dtG5GERCsG5P6KGZZ+zXgSm=RGbiwcWd0kFQeHEZSA0A@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Monica Martin (MS OPEN TECH)" <momartin@microsoft.com>
Cc: Timed Text Working Group <public-tt@w3.org>
I will change both of the shall to must to be consistent. TTML10 always
uses must.

On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 3:01 AM, Monica Martin (MS OPEN TECH) <
momartin@microsoft.com> wrote:

> Comments: There are only 2 instances where SHALL is used instead of MUST.
> One is a further description of an existing mandatory (MUST) requirement,
> R0006.   R0006 could remain as is.
>
> Proposal: Revise R0047 to use MUST.
>
> Monica
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Timed Text Working Group Issue Tracker [mailto:sysbot+tracker@w3.org
> ]
> Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 11:54 PM
> To: public-tt@w3.org
> Subject: ISSUE-186: confusion about SHALL vs MUST [Simple Delivery Profile
> for Closed Captions]
>
> ISSUE-186: confusion about SHALL vs MUST [Simple Delivery Profile for
> Closed Captions]
>
> http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/186
>
> Raised by: Glenn Adams
> On product: Simple Delivery Profile for Closed Captions
>
> SDP-US uses both SHALL and MUST in an arbitrary fashion; need to choose
> one and stick with it
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 25 September 2012 01:55:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:06:05 UTC