W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tt@w3.org > September 2012

RE: ISSUE-186: confusion about SHALL vs MUST [Simple Delivery Profile for Closed Captions]

From: Monica Martin (MS OPEN TECH) <momartin@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 19:01:44 +0000
To: Timed Text Working Group <public-tt@w3.org>
Message-ID: <5144f77c9d924252aa4294a404efdc55@BLUPR03MB603.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Comments: There are only 2 instances where SHALL is used instead of MUST. One is a further description of an existing mandatory (MUST) requirement, R0006.   R0006 could remain as is.

Proposal: Revise R0047 to use MUST.

Monica


-----Original Message-----
From: Timed Text Working Group Issue Tracker [mailto:sysbot+tracker@w3.org] 
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 11:54 PM
To: public-tt@w3.org
Subject: ISSUE-186: confusion about SHALL vs MUST [Simple Delivery Profile for Closed Captions]

ISSUE-186: confusion about SHALL vs MUST [Simple Delivery Profile for Closed Captions]

http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/186


Raised by: Glenn Adams
On product: Simple Delivery Profile for Closed Captions

SDP-US uses both SHALL and MUST in an arbitrary fashion; need to choose one and stick with it






Received on Monday, 24 September 2012 19:04:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:06:05 UTC