W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tt@w3.org > September 2012

Re: ISSUE-186: confusion about SHALL vs MUST [Simple Delivery Profile for Closed Captions]

From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 10:04:42 +0800
Message-ID: <CACQ=j+fN1OdPOr+8bnv8WLG2=4PJTRAJDUmKZE6dGwWL5rDDfA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Monica Martin (MS OPEN TECH)" <momartin@microsoft.com>
Cc: Timed Text Working Group <public-tt@w3.org>
FIxed at https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ttml/rev/3d8fcd3f0193. Rewrote R0006 to use
"an element MUST NOT" instead of "no element shall...".

However, I see this is a problem also, which I will report in another issue.

On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote:

> I will change both of the shall to must to be consistent. TTML10 always
> uses must.
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 3:01 AM, Monica Martin (MS OPEN TECH) <
> momartin@microsoft.com> wrote:
>
>> Comments: There are only 2 instances where SHALL is used instead of MUST.
>> One is a further description of an existing mandatory (MUST) requirement,
>> R0006.   R0006 could remain as is.
>>
>> Proposal: Revise R0047 to use MUST.
>>
>> Monica
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Timed Text Working Group Issue Tracker [mailto:
>> sysbot+tracker@w3.org]
>> Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 11:54 PM
>> To: public-tt@w3.org
>> Subject: ISSUE-186: confusion about SHALL vs MUST [Simple Delivery
>> Profile for Closed Captions]
>>
>> ISSUE-186: confusion about SHALL vs MUST [Simple Delivery Profile for
>> Closed Captions]
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/186
>>
>> Raised by: Glenn Adams
>> On product: Simple Delivery Profile for Closed Captions
>>
>> SDP-US uses both SHALL and MUST in an arbitrary fashion; need to choose
>> one and stick with it
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Tuesday, 25 September 2012 02:07:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:06:05 UTC