RE: Spec question. xml:space

Perhaps a note in the Section 4 abstract document type, or under xml:space  would clarify this?

Sean Hayes
Media Accessibility Strategist
Accessibility Business Unit
Microsoft

Office:  +44 118 909 5867,
Mobile: +44 7875 091385

From: Glenn A. Adams [mailto:gadams@xfsi.com]
Sent: 16 April 2009 3:28 PM
To: Sean Hayes; Public TTWG List
Subject: Re: Spec question. xml:space

It's not straightforward to extract this information from the text of the spec. From the RNG schema's Content Module (C.1.2.3), the definition of TTAF.Inline.class includes the keyword "text", which is referenced by TTAF.p.content, but not by TTAF.div.content. TTAF.div.content includes TTAF.Block.class which does not include "text". A similar logic applies for the XSD schema.

On 4/16/09 10:20 PM, "Sean Hayes" <Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com> wrote:
Thanks, that's kind of what I thought, but I don't see what combination of spec references provides that answer.

From: Glenn A. Adams [mailto:gadams@xfsi.com]
Sent: 16 April 2009 2:53 PM
To: Sean Hayes; Public TTWG List
Subject: Re: Spec question. xml:space


On 4/16/09 8:57 PM, "Sean Hayes" <Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com> wrote:
I'm  trying to determine the proper handling of xml:space in the following example fragment:

My question is, what if anything should happen to preserved space between the div and first and last p and between the p elements. Inline text is not legal here, so should anonymous <p> elements be inserted, or is the space  ignored?
[GA] It (the whitespace) is ignored since the content type for <tt:div> is not MIXED.