Re: Alternate syntax for required features.

here are the relevant links:

http://dev.w3.org/2008/tt/spec/ttaf1-dfxp.html#features
http://dev.w3.org/2008/tt/spec/ttaf1-dfxp.html#feature-transformation-mandat
ory-table
http://dev.w3.org/2008/tt/spec/ttaf1-dfxp.html#feature-presentation-mandator
y-table

On 4/16/09 2:46 PM, "Glenn Adams" <gadams@xfsi.com> wrote:

> 
> have  you read appendix E in the current editor¹s draft? especially tables E-2
> and E-3? this material has been available for review since Jan 30... but you
> may be behind in your reading...
> 
> On 4/16/09 2:07 PM, "John Birch" <john.birch@screen.subtitling.com> wrote:
> 
>> I personally would like to see is some example use of the profile mechanism
>> **within** the current specification. Is it possible to create a minimal set
>> of dfxp features (perhaps that closely match the ccforflash implementation
>> for example) that could be 'termed' dfxp-lite and to declare that within the
>> spec ??
>> 
>> With respect,
>> John
>