- From: Xueying Deng <Xueying_Deng@outlook.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 09:42:52 +0000
- To: Pieter Colpaert <pieter.colpaert@ugent.be>, "public-treecg@w3.org" <public-treecg@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 1 February 2024 10:46:54 UTC
Good morning 🙂 I vote for having a separate repo for the member extraction algorithm. It is not only useful for extracting members for a TREE structure stream but also useful for extracting certain members from a big RDF Graph. Thanks Best regards, Xueying ________________________________ From: Pieter Colpaert <pieter.colpaert@ugent.be> Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2024 10:22 To: public-treecg@w3.org <public-treecg@w3.org> Subject: Splitting off the member extraction algorithm in a separate report? Hi all, I’ve received some comments when pitching the member extraction algorithm that this report should probably be a separate report from the main TREE specification, as the algorithm itself is useful beyond TREE. What are your thoughts on that? It would entail giving the member extraction algorithm its own repository and spec document. Kind regards, Pieter -- https://pietercolpaert.be +32486747122
Received on Thursday, 1 February 2024 10:46:54 UTC