Splitting off the member extraction algorithm in a separate report? from Pieter Colpaert on 2024-02-01 (public-treecg@w3.org from February 2024)

From: Pieter Colpaert <pieter.colpaert@ugent.be>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 10:22:21 +0100
To: "public-treecg@w3.org" <public-treecg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <f2400a9d-40b3-43b6-a3ac-f7caa7ce12df@ugent.be>

Hi all,

I’ve received some comments when pitching the member extraction 
algorithm that this report should probably be a separate report from the 
main TREE specification, as the algorithm itself is useful beyond TREE.

What are your thoughts on that? It would entail giving the member 
extraction algorithm its own repository and spec document.

Kind regards,

Pieter

-- 
https://pietercolpaert.be
+32486747122

Received on Thursday, 1 February 2024 09:22:33 UTC