- From: Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) <mts-std@schunter.org>
- Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 19:02:46 +0200
- To: public-tracking@w3.org
Hi Aleecia (and all other members of the TPWG), I publicly issue a clear "yeah" to Roy's edits (on behalf of the whole TPWG): He emptied the editing queue and cleaned the document considerably. ;-) We discussed the changes in the call and our impression was that they are in line with what we wanted to achieve. I also see your point that the edits may have introduced potential bugs or inconsistencies. As a consequence, we decided to give us two weeks to re-review the spec to ensure that - Documented WG consensus is correctly implemented - Editorial and technical inconsistencies have not been introduced - We are fine shipping the document as CR. ACTION: Please review the current draft and mail potential improvements, feedback, and questions to the list... Regards, matthias PS: Info on the current draft The current ED is at https://w3c.github.io/dnt/drafts/tracking-dnt.html#rep.controller a complete side-by-side diff of the changes since CR is at https://w3c.github.io/dnt/diffs/diff_tpe_CR_to_ED_20170702.html and the blow-by-blow history can be seen at https://github.com/w3c/dnt/commits/master/drafts/tracking-dnt.html On 03.07.2017 18:00, Aleecia M. McDonald wrote: > Mixed emotions: > - some of Roy’s changes are really quite good and will make for a more readable document, among other things. > - what sort of broken & hijacked process leads us to non-trivial changes this close to the wire with no ability to review or respond in a sane way? > > Yay / Boo / Argh. > > There is no point in my getting in the way. Just please note I protest how this has happened. It appears my time is utterly wasted here. Again. It gets tedious. > > Aleecia >
Received on Monday, 3 July 2017 17:03:18 UTC