- From: Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) <mts-std@schunter.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 15:09:54 +0200
- To: public-tracking@w3.org
Hi! Thanks a lot! I agree. Note that we should do this for both specs separately (TPE and TCS) to understand what features of what spec to pursue further. matthias Am 23.08.2016 22:36, schrieb David Singer: > I think a test site that actually exercised the full spec., and deployment sites that in aggregate used the full spec., would help move matters along. > >> On Aug 23, 2016, at 16:23 , Mike O'Neill <michael.oneill@baycloud.com> wrote: >> >> I know of at least one company looking into implementing DNT right now, including using the API, and several others who will in the next year. I hope to be able to introduce at least one in the next few weeks. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Rob van Eijk [mailto:rob@blaeu.com] >> Sent: 23 August 2016 20:29 >> To: Carl Cargill <cargill@adobe.com> >> Cc: Aleecia M. McDonald <aleecia@aleecia.com>; public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org) (public-tracking@w3.org) <public-tracking@w3.org> >> Subject: RE: fyi: European Demand for DNT >> >> >> A realistic outcome to work on are standard implementations. It should >> be obvious and simple for companies to implement the standard. The >> standard implementations should cover the whole range of realistic use >> case, e.g. out-of-band consent, site specific consent scenario's, and >> all the way up the stack to web wide opt-out scenario's. >> >> Morover, we should - in my view - think through how we can improve the >> building blocks in the TPE to help organizations that do not have access >> to the web server configuration and are therefore not able to configure >> the HTTP Header. >> >> I will try to bring at least one big organization to the table that is >> willing to explore implementation at scale. >> >> Rob >> >> Carl Cargill schreef op 2016-08-23 20:10: >>> All - >>> >>> I think that Aleecia's suggestion to gather information on use and >>> potential outcomes has merit. It would be good to be able to show >>> that - if the charter is extended/recreated, there will be a need/use >>> for the spec. I'll be happy to act as the advocate for such a meeting >>> (A BoF table or meeting after regularly scheduled activities) at TPAC. >>> The only thing that I ask is that the meeting work towards an >>> outcome, and not serve as a bully pulpit for an opinion. As I've >>> often said, a standard only gains credibility when it is implemented >>> on a scale that impacts the market. >>> >>> Carl >>> >>> >>> Carl Cargill >>> Principal Scientist, Standards >>> Adobe Systems, Inc. >>> cargill@adobe >>> Work: +1 541 488 0040 >>> Mobile: +1 650 759 9803 >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Aleecia M. McDonald [mailto:aleecia@aleecia.com] >>> Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2016 10:55 AM >>> To: public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org) >>> (public-tracking@w3.org) <public-tracking@w3.org> >>> Subject: Re: fyi: European Demand for DNT >>> >>> +1 to postponing the charter decision pending more information / real >>> world outcomes. >>> I think that is wise and has minimal cost. >>> >>> I would call in to TPAC, if possible. I cannot attend in person. >>> >>> (We also talked of a hackathon. I have a meeting tomorrow that will >>> help me understand the level of pain involved to throw one.) >>> >>> Aleecia >>> >>>> On Aug 23, 2016, at 10:15 AM, Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joe@cdt.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> I will be there mid-week and could make Wednesday, I think. best, Joe >>>> >>>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 10:39 AM, TOUBIANA Vincent <vtoubiana@cnil.fr> >>>> wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> If this session is confirmed I'm also likely to attend. >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> >>>>> Vincent >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ________________________________________ >>>>> De : Mike O'Neill [michael.oneill@baycloud.com] >>>>> Envoyé : mardi 23 août 2016 16:26 >>>>> À : 'Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)'; public-tracking@w3.org >>>>> Objet : RE: fyi: European Demand for DNT >>>>> >>>>> I have booked in for TPAC middle 3 days, though not air tickets yet. >>>>> I will be there if others are going. >>>>> >>>>> From: Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) >>>>> [mailto:mts-std@schunter.org] >>>>> Sent: 23 August 2016 13:58 >>>>> To: public-tracking@w3.org >>>>> Subject: Re: fyi: European Demand for DNT >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi Jeff, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> thanks for your quick response! To be honest: I have not 100% decided >>>>> whether I can make TPAC (and you caught me at it) ;-) >>>>> >>>>> I agree that such a discussion would be worthwhile. Ideally, I would >>>>> like to obtain some indication of potential interest before deciding >>>>> whether to reschedule my other travels to make room for attending >>>>> TPAC. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Could you and/or Wendy advise me how to best make it happen? >>>>> >>>>> The best option seems to me to propose a breakout session for >>>>> wednesday, right? Are there other preferred options? >>>>> Is there a list to which I could send a "call for participation" to >>>>> collect expressions of interest? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Matthias >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Am 23.08.2016 14:26, schrieb Jeff Jaffe: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 8/23/2016 8:17 AM, Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Team, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> one point we discussed during our last call was whether the EU >>>>> landscape >>>>> changes and whether TPE may play a key role to simplify compliance >>>>> with >>>>> the changing EU landscape. >>>>> >>>>> I had an interesting discussion with Rob. What I learned is that the >>>>> EU >>>>> regulators are currently pushing for more informed consent and that >>>>> the >>>>> current "implied consent" for tracking and cookies may soon go away. >>>>> Another topic will be machine-managed and readable consent to >>>>> simplify >>>>> consent handingl >>>>> >>>>> Regulations that are upcoming (Rob: Please correct me if I remembered >>>>> correctly): >>>>> - 2018 E Privacy Regulation (replacing the 1995 privacy directive by >>>>> one >>>>> EU-wide regulation) >>>>> - 2019 Cookie Regulation (replacing the 2009 cookie directive by one >>>>> EU-wide regulation) >>>>> In September, a first draft will be published. >>>>> >>>>> If web-site owners agree with these observations, then there should >>>>> be >>>>> increasing demand for DNT (or other approaches for handling consent). >>>>> >>>>> What I am now looking for is: >>>>> - Input from EU players whether they are indeed concerned on how to >>>>> handle automated consent >>>>> - Further requirements how W3C TPWG can simplify compliance in the EU >>>>> - Additional members of our WG that can represent this perspective >>>>> and >>>>> requirements (ideally from an end-user perspective). >>>>> - I may try to visit the TPAC in Lisbon to gather more inputs. >>>>> >>>>> I will try to reach out to IAB Europe (I will also discuss with EFF >>>>> to >>>>> get their input on using TPE for expressing compliance with EFF >>>>> rules). >>>>> >>>>> Formally, I would like to postpone the re-charter discussion into >>>>> October to have more data as input for this decision (e.g. one input >>>>> will be the draft EU cookie regulation published in September). >>>>> >>>>> Any inputs, suggestions, feedback are welcome! >>>>> >>>>> All that makes sense to me. >>>>> >>>>> But it leaves out what item that we discussed at the last call. I >>>>> thought you were going to assemble the major European players at TPAC >>>>> (since it is in Lisbon, so they will be there already) and use that >>>>> meeting to assess the common understanding of the need for DNT. Your >>>>> comment above ("I may visit TPAC") sounds like the idea of a major >>>>> discussion in TPAC has been dropped. Do I understand correctly? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> matthias >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Joseph Lorenzo Hall >>>> Chief Technologist, Center for Democracy & Technology >>>> [https://www.cdt.org] >>>> 1401 K ST NW STE 200, Washington DC 20005-3497 >>>> e: joe@cdt.org, p: 202.407.8825, pgp: https://josephhall.org/gpg-key >>>> Fingerprint: 3CA2 8D7B 9F6D DBD3 4B10 1607 5F86 6987 40A9 A871 >>>> >>>> >> >> >> > Dave Singer > > singer@mac.com > >
Received on Wednesday, 24 August 2016 13:10:28 UTC