- From: Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) <mts-std@schunter.org>
- Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 14:57:36 +0200
- To: public-tracking@w3.org
- Message-ID: <57BC4840.7000609@schunter.org>
Hi Jeff,
thanks for your quick response! To be honest: I have not 100% decided
whether I can make TPAC (and you caught me at it) ;-)
I agree that such a discussion would be worthwhile. Ideally, I would
like to obtain some indication of potential interest before deciding
whether to reschedule my other travels to make room for attending TPAC.
Could you and/or Wendy advise me how to best make it happen?
The best option seems to me to propose a breakout session for wednesday,
right? Are there other preferred options?
Is there a list to which I could send a "call for participation" to
collect expressions of interest?
Regards,
Matthias
Am 23.08.2016 14:26, schrieb Jeff Jaffe:
>
>
> On 8/23/2016 8:17 AM, Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) wrote:
>> Hi Team,
>>
>>
>> one point we discussed during our last call was whether the EU landscape
>> changes and whether TPE may play a key role to simplify compliance with
>> the changing EU landscape.
>>
>> I had an interesting discussion with Rob. What I learned is that the EU
>> regulators are currently pushing for more informed consent and that the
>> current "implied consent" for tracking and cookies may soon go away.
>> Another topic will be machine-managed and readable consent to simplify
>> consent handingl
>>
>> Regulations that are upcoming (Rob: Please correct me if I remembered
>> correctly):
>> - 2018 E Privacy Regulation (replacing the 1995 privacy directive by one
>> EU-wide regulation)
>> - 2019 Cookie Regulation (replacing the 2009 cookie directive by one
>> EU-wide regulation)
>> In September, a first draft will be published.
>>
>> If web-site owners agree with these observations, then there should be
>> increasing demand for DNT (or other approaches for handling consent).
>>
>> What I am now looking for is:
>> - Input from EU players whether they are indeed concerned on how to
>> handle automated consent
>> - Further requirements how W3C TPWG can simplify compliance in the EU
>> - Additional members of our WG that can represent this perspective and
>> requirements (ideally from an end-user perspective).
>> - I may try to visit the TPAC in Lisbon to gather more inputs.
>>
>> I will try to reach out to IAB Europe (I will also discuss with EFF to
>> get their input on using TPE for expressing compliance with EFF rules).
>>
>> Formally, I would like to postpone the re-charter discussion into
>> October to have more data as input for this decision (e.g. one input
>> will be the draft EU cookie regulation published in September).
>>
>> Any inputs, suggestions, feedback are welcome!
>
> All that makes sense to me.
>
> But it leaves out what item that we discussed at the last call. I
> thought you were going to assemble the major European players at TPAC
> (since it is in Lisbon, so they will be there already) and use that
> meeting to assess the common understanding of the need for DNT. Your
> comment above ("I may visit TPAC") sounds like the idea of a major
> discussion in TPAC has been dropped. Do I understand correctly?
>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> matthias
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 23 August 2016 12:58:08 UTC