- From: Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) <mts-std@schunter.org>
- Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 14:57:36 +0200
- To: public-tracking@w3.org
- Message-ID: <57BC4840.7000609@schunter.org>
Hi Jeff, thanks for your quick response! To be honest: I have not 100% decided whether I can make TPAC (and you caught me at it) ;-) I agree that such a discussion would be worthwhile. Ideally, I would like to obtain some indication of potential interest before deciding whether to reschedule my other travels to make room for attending TPAC. Could you and/or Wendy advise me how to best make it happen? The best option seems to me to propose a breakout session for wednesday, right? Are there other preferred options? Is there a list to which I could send a "call for participation" to collect expressions of interest? Regards, Matthias Am 23.08.2016 14:26, schrieb Jeff Jaffe: > > > On 8/23/2016 8:17 AM, Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) wrote: >> Hi Team, >> >> >> one point we discussed during our last call was whether the EU landscape >> changes and whether TPE may play a key role to simplify compliance with >> the changing EU landscape. >> >> I had an interesting discussion with Rob. What I learned is that the EU >> regulators are currently pushing for more informed consent and that the >> current "implied consent" for tracking and cookies may soon go away. >> Another topic will be machine-managed and readable consent to simplify >> consent handingl >> >> Regulations that are upcoming (Rob: Please correct me if I remembered >> correctly): >> - 2018 E Privacy Regulation (replacing the 1995 privacy directive by one >> EU-wide regulation) >> - 2019 Cookie Regulation (replacing the 2009 cookie directive by one >> EU-wide regulation) >> In September, a first draft will be published. >> >> If web-site owners agree with these observations, then there should be >> increasing demand for DNT (or other approaches for handling consent). >> >> What I am now looking for is: >> - Input from EU players whether they are indeed concerned on how to >> handle automated consent >> - Further requirements how W3C TPWG can simplify compliance in the EU >> - Additional members of our WG that can represent this perspective and >> requirements (ideally from an end-user perspective). >> - I may try to visit the TPAC in Lisbon to gather more inputs. >> >> I will try to reach out to IAB Europe (I will also discuss with EFF to >> get their input on using TPE for expressing compliance with EFF rules). >> >> Formally, I would like to postpone the re-charter discussion into >> October to have more data as input for this decision (e.g. one input >> will be the draft EU cookie regulation published in September). >> >> Any inputs, suggestions, feedback are welcome! > > All that makes sense to me. > > But it leaves out what item that we discussed at the last call. I > thought you were going to assemble the major European players at TPAC > (since it is in Lisbon, so they will be there already) and use that > meeting to assess the common understanding of the need for DNT. Your > comment above ("I may visit TPAC") sounds like the idea of a major > discussion in TPAC has been dropped. Do I understand correctly? > >> >> >> Regards, >> matthias >> >> >> >> >> > >
Received on Tuesday, 23 August 2016 12:58:08 UTC