RE: 409 status code from Mike O'Neill on 2014-03-26 (public-tracking@w3.org from March 2014)

From: Mike O'Neill <michael.oneill@baycloud.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 17:16:08 -0000
To: "'Roy T. Fielding'" <fielding@gbiv.com>
Cc: <public-tracking@w3.org>, "Adrian Bateman" <adrianba@microsoft.com>
Message-ID: <13f601cf4917$1497ec90$3dc7c5b0$@baycloud.com>

 

Thought of an interoperability problem with the 409. If script on a page
(accessed with DNT set) does a PUT update against an Azure storage blob
(assuming it supports CORS), a 409 SC might be taken by the UA or add-on as
a third-party rejection of DNT.

 

Mike

Received on Wednesday, 26 March 2014 17:16:42 UTC