The new third clause goes to data minimization; let's keep that issue discrete. <div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Ninja Marnau <ninja@w3.org> </div><div>Date:06/25/2014 10:59 AM (GMT-05:00) </div><div>To: Mike O'Neill <michael.oneill@baycloud.com>,'Justin Brookman' <jbrookman@cdt.org>,Walter van Holst <walter.van.holst@xs4all.nl>,rob@blaeu.com,jeff@democraticmedia.org,Alan Chapell <achapell@chapellassociates.com> </div><div>Cc: public-tracking@w3.org </div><div>Subject: Re: issure-219 </div><div> </div>Mike, is this meant as a friendly amendment to Walter's proposal or a new one? Am 25.06.14 16:29, schrieb Mike O'Neill: Hi Justin, So we are already OK, I missed that. The proposal then becomes simply: If a third party receives a DNT: 1 signal then: 1. the third party MUST NOT collect, retain, share, or use data related to the network interaction as part of which it received the DNT: 1 signal; 2. the third party MUST NOT use data about the user gathered in another context, including when it was a first party. I would also add the new sentence about unique identifiers, along with the proposal for limiting their duration if for a permitted use, but maybe that will need its own CfO? 3. the third party MUST NOT store in the user-agent, or derive from data already stored, any unique identifiers. Mike Mike O'Neill Technical Director Baycloud Systems Oxford Centre for Innovation New Road Oxford OX1 1BY Tel. 01865 735619 Fax: 01865 261401 Email: michael.oneill@baycloud.com Professional Profile See who we know in common Want a signature like this? -- Ninja Marnau Technology & Society Domain World Wide Web Consortium, W3C
Received on Wednesday, 25 June 2014 15:10:14 UTC