Re: issure-219

Mike, is this meant as a friendly amendment to Walter's proposal or a 
new one?

Am 25.06.14 16:29, schrieb Mike O'Neill:
>
> Hi Justin,
>
> So we are already OK, I missed that.
>
> The proposal then becomes simply:
>
> If a third party receives a DNT: 1 signal then:
>
> 1. the third party MUST NOT collect, retain, share, or use data 
> related to the network interaction as part of which it received the 
> DNT: 1 signal;
>
> 2. the third party MUST NOT use data about the user gathered in 
> another context, including when it was a first party.
>
> I would also add the new sentence about unique identifiers, along with 
> the proposal for limiting their duration if for a permitted use, but 
> maybe that will need its own CfO?
>
> 3. the third party MUST NOT store in the user-agent, or derive from 
> data already stored, any unique identifiers.
>
> Mike
>
> *Mike O'Neill*
>
> Technical Director
>
> *Baycloud Systems*
>
> Oxford Centre for Innovation
>
> New Road
>
> Oxford
>
> OX1 1BY
>
> Tel. 01865 735619
>
> Fax: 01865 261401
>
> 	
>
> Description: 
> http://www.linkedin.com/img/signature/pic_plastic_cool_26x130.gif
>
> 	
>
> *Email:*michael.oneill@baycloud.com <mailto:michael.oneill@baycloud.com>
> Description: 
> http://www.linkedin.com/img/signature/icon_in_blue_14x14.gif*Professional 
> Profile <http://www.linkedin.com/pub/11/894/925>*
>
> 	
>
> See who we know in common <http://www.linkedin.com/e/wwk/41003309/>
>
> 	
>
> Want a signature like this? <http://www.linkedin.com/e/sig/41003309/>
>

-- 
Ninja Marnau
Technology & Society Domain
World Wide Web Consortium, W3C