W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > June 2014

Re: Agenda for June 11 TPWG call

From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 09:03:55 -0400
Cc: "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Message-id: <8D7D106A-D0E1-44A9-BE97-60FB77E3F345@apple.com>
To: Ninja Marnau <ninja@w3.org>
My regrets, I will be travelling back from the W3C AC meeting.

On Jun 9, 2014, at 16:28 , Ninja Marnau <ninja@w3.org> wrote:

> AGENDA: 
> ---------------------------------- 
> 
> 1. Confirmation of scribe. Volunteers welcome! 
> 
> 2. Offline-caller-identification (see end for instructions) 
> 
> ---------------------------------- 
> --- Issues for this Call --- 
> 
> 3. Service Providers
> 
> ISSUE-206: Service Provider name and requirements
> https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/206
> http://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Service_Provider
> June 11: M3 (announcement): Call for objections to validate / determine consensus
> 
> Together with:
> ISSUE-49: Third party as first party - is a third party that collects data on behalf of the first party treated the same way as the first party?
> https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/49
> 
> 4. Data Append and First Parties
> 
> ISSUE-170: Definition of and what/whether limitations around data append and first parties 
> https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/170 
> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_First_Party_Compliance
> June 11: M2 (discussion): List of change proposals is frozen; Discussion whether clear consensus emerges for one change proposal 
> 
> 5. Context Separation
> 
> ISSUE-219: Context Separation - Limitations on use in a 3rd party context of data collected in a 1st party context 
> https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/219 
> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Limitations_on_use_in_Third_Party_Context 
> June 11: M2 (discussion): List of change proposals is frozen; Discussion whether clear consensus emerges for one change proposal 
> 
> 6. Data Minimization
> This topic includes an array of related issues.
> 
> ISSUE-31: Minimization - to what extent will minimization be required for use of a particular exemption? (conditional exemptions)
> https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/31
> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposals_on_data_minimization
> (All text proposals for this topic will be listed on this wiki page)
> June 11: M1 (discussion): Initial change proposals have been submitted; Discussion on change proposals; Call for final list of change proposals 
> 
> Together with:
> ISSUE-199: Limitations on the use of unique identifiers
> https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/199
> 
> ISSUE-211: Should we specify retention periods (extended with transparency) for permitted uses?
> https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/211
> 
> ISSUE-220: Proportionality should be across the board
> https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/220
> 
> ISSUE-233: Data Minimization, Retention and Transparency
> https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/233
> 
> 
> ================ Summary Documentation on Resolving ISSUES ================= 
> 
> PHASES to resolve issues: 
> M0 (announcement): Initial call for change proposals; All change proposals should be drafted 
> M1 (discussion): Initial change proposals have been submitted; Discussion on change proposals; Call for final list of change proposals 
> M2 (discussion): List of change proposals is frozen; Discussion whether clear consensus emerges for one change proposal 
> M3 (announcement): Call for objections to validate / determine consensus 
> M5 (deadline): Deadline for inputs to call for objections (2 weeks after M3); Analysis starts 
> M7 (announcement): Results are announced 
> 
> ================ Infrastructure ================= 
> 
> Zakim teleconference bridge: 
> VoIP: sip:zakim@voip.w3.org 
> Phone +1.617.761.6200 passcode TRACK (87225) 
> IRC Chat: irc.w3.org<http://irc.w3.org/>, port 6665, #dnt 
> 
> OFFLINE caller identification: 
> If you intend to join the phone call, you must either associate your 
> phone number with your IRC username once you've joined the call 
> (command: "Zakim, [ID] is [name]" e.g., "Zakim, ??P19 is schunter" in my 
> case), or let Nick know your phone number ahead of time. If you are not 
> comfortable with the Zakim IRC syntax for associating your phone number, 
> please email your name and phone number to 
> npdoty@w3.org<mailto:npdoty@w3.org>. We want to reduce (in fact, 
> eliminate) the time spent on the call identifying phone numbers. Note 
> that if your number is not identified and you do not respond to 
> off-the-phone reminders via IRC, you will be dropped from the call.

David Singer
Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Tuesday, 10 June 2014 13:04:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 3 November 2017 21:45:22 UTC