- From: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:47:19 -0500
- To: "Dobbs, Brooks" <Brooks.Dobbs@kbmg.com>, Alan Chapell <achapell@chapellassociates.com>, "Jack L. Hobaugh Jr" <jack@networkadvertising.org>
- CC: "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <52FA7037.6000402@w3.org>
Brooks, Neither. I did not say the names are not being disclosed. When I was asked on 23 January I said I wanted to wait until we knew which companies were going to sign up (or at least which ones were going to sign up early in the year). Jeff On 2/11/2014 12:44 PM, Dobbs, Brooks wrote: > Jeff, > So I am still unclear as to the reasoning. Are the names not being > disclosed because: 1) simply as a matter of general W3C policy, you > are internally debating if sources should be divulged or 2) > contributors have been specifically promised anonymity? > -Brooks > > -- > > *Brooks Dobbs, CIPP *| Chief Privacy Officer |*KBM Group* | Part of > the Wunderman Network > (Tel) 678 580 2683 | (Mob) 678 492 1662 | *kbmg.com* > _brooks.dobbs@kbmg.com > > > _ > This email – including attachments – may contain confidential > information. If you are not the intended recipient, > do not copy, distribute or act on it. Instead, notify the sender > immediately and delete the message. > > From: Alan Chapell <achapell@chapellassociates.com > <mailto:achapell@chapellassociates.com>> > Date: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 12:00 PM > To: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org <mailto:jeff@w3.org>>, Brooks Dobbs > <brooks.dobbs@kbmg.com <mailto:brooks.dobbs@kbmg.com>>, "Jack L. > Hobaugh Jr" <jack@networkadvertising.org > <mailto:jack@networkadvertising.org>> > Cc: "public-tracking@w3.org <mailto:public-tracking@w3.org> > (public-tracking@w3.org <mailto:public-tracking@w3.org>)" > <public-tracking@w3.org <mailto:public-tracking@w3.org>> > Subject: Re: Request for Disclosure of W3C TPWG Funding Sources > > Jeff - > > This lack of transparency around which companies are providing funds > to sustain the work of the TPWG serves only to fuel serious questions > – for example, how the W3C's quest for funding on such an economically > charged debate might result in particular scrutiny should funders of > the effort also find themselves less disadvantaged by the outcome than > non-funders. Although transparency won't entirely assuage all > concerns, it would be an important first step. > > I encourage you to reconsider. > > Cheers, > > Alan Chapell > > > > From: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org <mailto:jeff@w3.org>> > Date: Sunday, January 26, 2014 10:09 PM > To: "Dobbs, Brooks" <Brooks.Dobbs@kbmg.com > <mailto:Brooks.Dobbs@kbmg.com>>, "Jack L. Hobaugh Jr" > <jack@networkadvertising.org <mailto:jack@networkadvertising.org>> > Cc: "public-tracking@w3.org <mailto:public-tracking@w3.org> > (public-tracking@w3.org <mailto:public-tracking@w3.org>)" > <public-tracking@w3.org <mailto:public-tracking@w3.org>> > Subject: Re: Request for Disclosure of W3C TPWG Funding Sources > Resent-From: <public-tracking@w3.org <mailto:public-tracking@w3.org>> > Resent-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 03:09:25 +0000 > > Brooks, > > We have not established a policy for the various sponsors of W3C > events and activities that they must be publicly disclosed. There > are quite a number each year, and some prefer anonymity. > > Last year, when there was a request for disclosure for TPWG, we > consulted with the Sponsors. There was general comfort with > disclosure at that time; although some only wanted to disclose if > all the others would disclose as well. I was pleased to be able > to disclose the Sponsor names with the comfort of all of the Sponsors. > > I would like to give this year's Sponsors the benefit of having > that same discussion with other Sponsors for this year. > > Jeff > > On 1/24/2014 2:55 PM, Dobbs, Brooks wrote: >> Jeff, >> >> I agree with previous commenters here, and feel it is important >> for there there to be transparency into financial support for >> this effort. I am not sure how the ongoing process of seeking >> more contributors impacts the need for or timing of transparency. >> Are we to take from this that a negotiable term in providing >> funding would be to have such funding be non-disclosable? If the >> list is simply incomplete at this time, can I suggest we simply >> start with an email showing current funders and add to it as new >> participants come on? A couple more TPWG emails won't push my >> box past its limit. >> >> -Brooks >> >> >> -- >> >> *Brooks Dobbs, CIPP *| Chief Privacy Officer |*KBM Group* | Part >> of the Wunderman Network >> (Tel) 678 580 2683 | (Mob) 678 492 1662 | *kbmg.com* >> _brooks.dobbs@kbmg.com >> >> >> _ >> This email – including attachments – may contain confidential >> information. If you are not the intended recipient, >> do not copy, distribute or act on it. Instead, notify the sender >> immediately and delete the message. >> >> From: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org <mailto:jeff@w3.org>> >> Date: Thursday, January 23, 2014 5:36 PM >> To: "Jack L. Hobaugh Jr" <jack@networkadvertising.org >> <mailto:jack@networkadvertising.org>> >> Cc: "public-tracking@w3.org <mailto:public-tracking@w3.org> >> (public-tracking@w3.org <mailto:public-tracking@w3.org>)" >> <public-tracking@w3.org <mailto:public-tracking@w3.org>> >> Subject: Re: Request for Disclosure of W3C TPWG Funding Sources >> Resent-From: <public-tracking@w3.org <mailto:public-tracking@w3.org>> >> Resent-Date: Thursday, January 23, 2014 5:36 PM >> >> Jack, >> >> Thanks for raising this issue and reminding the community that >> this fine work will best continue with additional sponsorship of >> the work - as we did last year. >> >> In terms of listing the sponsors, I certainly don't want to do >> this piecemeal. >> >> It is early in the year and we are still talking to various >> stakeholders about their willingness to sponsor. I would like to >> have the disclosure discussion after we have concluded the dialog >> with potential sponsors. >> >> Jeff >> >> On 1/23/2014 4:47 PM, Jack L. Hobaugh Jr wrote: >>> Jeff, >>> >>> Following the hiatus and during one of our weekly W3C TPWG >>> Wednesday teleconferences, you had mentioned that the W3C had >>> obtained additional funding for the TPWG’s work. One of the >>> TPWG participants then asked you to please disclose the source >>> of that funding. You stated that you could not disclose >>> the source of the funding at that time but that it might be >>> possible to disclose that information at a later date. Could you >>> please provide the TPWG with that information now? >>> >>> Thank you very much. >>> >>> Jack >>> >>> >>> *Jack L. Hobaugh Jr >>> *Network Advertising Initiative| Counsel & Senior Director of >>> Technology >>> 1634 Eye St. NW, Suite 750 Washington, DC 20006 >>> P: 202-347-5341| jack@networkadvertising.org >>> <mailto:jack@networkadvertising.org> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >
Received on Tuesday, 11 February 2014 18:47:30 UTC