W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > February 2014

RE: Agenda for February 5 call

From: Shane M Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 21:11:31 +0000
To: Ninja Marnau <ninja@w3.org>, "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Message-ID: <DCCF036E573F0142BD90964789F720E3143FF9D4@GQ1-MB01-02.y.corp.yahoo.com>
Sending my regrets for tomorrow's meeting.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ninja Marnau [mailto:ninja@w3.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 3:34 PM
To: public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)
Subject: Agenda for February 5 call

----------------------------------

1. Confirmation of scribe. Volunteers welcome!

2. Offline-caller-identification (see end for instructions)

----------------------------------
--- Issues for this Call ---

Note: See more info at the end for details.

ISSUE-239: Should tracking status representation include an array of links for claiming compliance by reference?
http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/239
http://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Proposals_on_status_URL_array_for_compliance_regimes 

Announcement of consensus for text proposal 1 on the wiki

ISSUE-241: Distinguish elements for site-internal use and elements that can be re-used by others (1/3)
https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/241
https://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Proposals_on_elements_for_1and3_party_use 

February 5: M3 (announcement): Call for objections to validate / determine consensus February 19: M5 (deadline): Deadline for inputs to call for objections
(2 weeks after M3); Analysis starts

ISSUE-240: Do we need to define context?
https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/240
http://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Proposals_on_the_definition_of_context
February 5: M2 (discussion): List of change proposals is frozen; discussion whether clear consensus emerges for one change proposal February 12: M3 (announcement): Call for objections to validate / determine consensus

AoB

================ Summary Documentation on Resolving ISSUES =================

PHASES to resolve issues:
M0 (announcement): Initial call for change proposals; All change proposals should be drafted
M1 (discussion): Initial change proposals have been submitted; Discussion on change proposals; Call for final list of change proposals
M2 (discussion): List of change proposals is frozen; Discussion whether clear consensus emerges for one change proposal
M3 (announcement): Call for objections to validate / determine consensus
M5 (deadline): Deadline for inputs to call for objections (2 weeks after M3); Analysis starts
M7 (announcement): Results are announced

STATUS of the ISSUES:
- OPEN During phases M0, M1, M2
- PENDING REVIEW: During phases M3, M5
- CLOSED after M7
All other issues are RAISED.
-----
================ Infrastructure =================

Zakim teleconference bridge:
VoIP: sip:zakim@voip.w3.org
Phone +1.617.761.6200 passcode TRACK (87225) IRC Chat: irc.w3.org<http://irc.w3.org/>, port 6665, #dnt

OFFLINE caller identification:
If you intend to join the phone call, you must either associate your phone number with your IRC username once you've joined the call
(command: "Zakim, [ID] is [name]" e.g., "Zakim, ??P19 is schunter" in my case), or let Nick know your phone number ahead of time. If you are not comfortable with the Zakim IRC syntax for associating your phone number, please email your name and phone number to npdoty@w3.org<mailto:npdoty@w3.org>. We want to reduce (in fact,
eliminate) the time spent on the call identifying phone numbers. Note that if your number is not identified and you do not respond to off-the-phone reminders via IRC, you will be dropped from the call.
Received on Tuesday, 4 February 2014 21:12:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:40:07 UTC