Re: wiki page re: issue-262 (was Re: Agenda for November 19 TPWG call)

Hi Vincent

what is “G” supposed to mean?  We’d have to document it...


> On Dec 3, 2014, at 7:22 , TOUBIANA Vincent <vtoubiana@cnil.fr> wrote:
> 
> Dear all,
>  
> Please find bellow a proposal for issue-262. I assumed that there is a “G” response that we discussed in a previous call even though  I did not find anything about that in the current documents.
>  
> Normative text:
> For Servers in direct communication with the User Agent that then communicate further with other parties within the same interaction but outside direct communication with the User Agent:
> ·         If they share tracking data about the interaction those servers SHOULD send a "G" response 
> ·         If they do not share tracking data about the interaction those servers SHOULD send a “N” response.
>  
>  
> Sorry for the short notice before the call.
>  
> Best regards,
>  
> Vincent
>  
> De : Nicholas Doty [mailto:npdoty@w3.org] 
> Envoyé : mercredi 19 novembre 2014 07:13
> À : TOUBIANA Vincent
> Cc : Tracking Protection Working Group
> Objet : wiki page re: issue-262 (was Re: Agenda for November 19 TPWG call)
>  
> I believe we're still waiting for specific text proposals on any changes to TPE in order to facilitate tracking status resources/responses from gateways and ad exchanges. I've created this wiki page for people to collect proposals:
> 
>         https://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Regarding_gateways_and_exchanges
> 
> I've added a link to Shane's text about consent (though I suspect that would actually be a Compliance change). Feel free to add more proposals there, although also send to the mailing list so that everyone can see.
> 
> Hope this helps, 
> Nick
> 
> On November 18, 2014, at 8:11 PM, TOUBIANA Vincent <vtoubiana@cnil.fr> wrote:
> 
> > I have to send regrets for today's call beacause I'll be travelling. Regarding issue-262, do we have a wiki page where we can compare the different proposals and add a new one?
> 
> > 
> > Best regards, 
> > 
> > Vincent 
> > 
> 
>  
> <html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=iso-8859-1"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><div>I believe we're still waiting for specific text proposals on any changes to TPE in order to facilitate tracking status resources/responses from gateways and ad exchanges. I've created this wiki page for people to collect proposals:</div><div><br></div><div><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre">     </span><a href="https://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Regarding_gateways_and_exchanges">https://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Regarding_gateways_and_exchanges</a></div><div><br></div><div>I've added a link to Shane's text about consent (though I suspect that would actually be a Compliance change). Feel free to add more proposals there, although also send to the mailing list so that everyone can see.</div><div><br></div><div>Hope this helps,</div><div>Nick</div><br><div><div>On November 18, 2014, at 8:11 PM, TOUBIANA Vincent &lt;<a href="mailto:vtoubiana@cnil.fr">vtoubiana@cnil.fr</a>&gt; wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite">
> 
>  
> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> 
> <meta name="Generator" content="MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7638.1"> 
> <title>RE: Agenda for November 19 TPWG call</title>
> 
> <div> 
> <!-- Converted from text/plain format --><p><font size="2">I have to send regrets for today's call beacause I'll be travelling. Regarding issue-262, do we have a wiki page where we can compare the different proposals and add a new one?<br>
> 
> <br> 
> Best regards,<br> 
> <br> 
> Vincent<br></font></p></div></blockquote></div><br></body></html>
> 

David Singer
Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.

Received on Thursday, 4 December 2014 22:28:03 UTC