- From: TOUBIANA Vincent <vtoubiana@cnil.fr>
- Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2014 00:00:08 +0100
- To: "David Singer" <singer@apple.com>
- Cc: "Tracking Protection Working Group" <public-tracking@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <01A1856C4999FF4287CCB37912A708EB04E12AA9@srv-cnilexc.cnil.fr>
Hi David, The "G" response was suggested by Roy during the call on 5th November (see minutes: http://www.w3.org/2014/11/05-dnt-minutes). During the call most people agreed that it could be a good solution. I believe that ad-exchange is the most common use case Issue 262 is meant to address. Roy will probably have more details about his idea. Vincent -----Original Message----- From: David Singer [mailto:singer@apple.com] Sent: Thu 12/4/2014 11:27 PM To: TOUBIANA Vincent Cc: Tracking Protection Working Group Subject: Re: wiki page re: issue-262 (was Re: Agenda for November 19 TPWG call) Hi Vincent what is "G" supposed to mean? We'd have to document it... > On Dec 3, 2014, at 7:22 , TOUBIANA Vincent <vtoubiana@cnil.fr> wrote: > > Dear all, > > Please find bellow a proposal for issue-262. I assumed that there is a "G" response that we discussed in a previous call even though I did not find anything about that in the current documents. > > Normative text: > For Servers in direct communication with the User Agent that then communicate further with other parties within the same interaction but outside direct communication with the User Agent: > · If they share tracking data about the interaction those servers SHOULD send a "G" response > · If they do not share tracking data about the interaction those servers SHOULD send a "N" response. > > > Sorry for the short notice before the call. > > Best regards, > > Vincent > > De : Nicholas Doty [mailto:npdoty@w3.org] > Envoyé : mercredi 19 novembre 2014 07:13 > À : TOUBIANA Vincent > Cc : Tracking Protection Working Group > Objet : wiki page re: issue-262 (was Re: Agenda for November 19 TPWG call) > > I believe we're still waiting for specific text proposals on any changes to TPE in order to facilitate tracking status resources/responses from gateways and ad exchanges. I've created this wiki page for people to collect proposals: > > https://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Regarding_gateways_and_exchanges > > I've added a link to Shane's text about consent (though I suspect that would actually be a Compliance change). Feel free to add more proposals there, although also send to the mailing list so that everyone can see. > > Hope this helps, > Nick > > On November 18, 2014, at 8:11 PM, TOUBIANA Vincent <vtoubiana@cnil.fr> wrote: > > > I have to send regrets for today's call beacause I'll be travelling. Regarding issue-262, do we have a wiki page where we can compare the different proposals and add a new one? > > > > > Best regards, > > > > Vincent > > > > > <html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=iso-8859-1"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><div>I believe we're still waiting for specific text proposals on any changes to TPE in order to facilitate tracking status resources/responses from gateways and ad exchanges. I've created this wiki page for people to collect proposals:</div><div><br></div><div><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span><a href="https://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Regarding_gateways_and_exchanges">https://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Regarding_gateways_and_exchanges</a></div><div><br></div><div>I've added a link to Shane's text about consent (though I suspect that would actually be a Compliance change). Feel free to add more proposals there, although also send to the mailing list so that everyone can see.</div><div><br></div><div>Hope this helps,</div><div>Nick</div><br><div><div>On November 18, 2014, at 8:11 PM, TOUBIANA Vincent <<a href="mailto:vtoubiana@cnil.fr">vtoubiana@cnil.fr</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"> > > > <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> > <meta name="Generator" content="MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7638.1"> > <title>RE: Agenda for November 19 TPWG call</title> > > <div> > <!-- Converted from text/plain format --><p><font size="2">I have to send regrets for today's call beacause I'll be travelling. Regarding issue-262, do we have a wiki page where we can compare the different proposals and add a new one?<br> > > <br> > Best regards,<br> > <br> > Vincent<br></font></p></div></blockquote></div><br></body></html> > David Singer Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Thursday, 4 December 2014 23:03:00 UTC