- From: David Singer <singer@mac.com>
- Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 11:27:00 -0800
- To: Nicholas Doty <npdoty@w3.org>
- Cc: Tracking Protection Working Group <public-tracking@w3.org>
U, this poll glaringly lacks the “no change” option… > On Nov 19, 2014, at 15:34 , Nicholas Doty <npdoty@w3.org> wrote: > > Hello TPWG, > > As discussed on the teleconference this week, the chairs are issuing a Call for Objections on ISSUE-235 regarding an auditability requirement for reasonable security measures. If you have an objection to one or both of the proposed options, please describe your objection via this poll with clear and specific reasoning. Please let the chairs (and Nick) know if you have any questions or detect any errors in the submission form. > > https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/49311/tpwg-auditing-235/ > > The poll is open now, and will close on December 3rd. > > Thanks, > Nick (for Justin, Carl, Matthias) > > (BCC public-tracking-announce for those not following public-tracking closely) Dave Singer singer@mac.com
Received on Wednesday, 3 December 2014 19:27:43 UTC