- From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 16:46:08 -0700
- To: "<public-tracking@w3.org>" <public-tracking@w3.org>
I had a possible action from this morning to trace-back to the “do not cross-site track” proposal I made. It was in April 2012 (wow), at <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking/2012Apr/0077.html> Interestingly I also tried to cover * is it OK to use cross-site data while responding to a transaction? (yes) * is it OK to record data gleaned from elsewhere during the transaction, possibly tainted by knowing site information? (no) I recognized that, as Roy does, the data will flow within a party. I don’t see any follow-up emails. It was discussed at the face to face in Washington on the 10th April, and the minutes, such as they are for that day, are here <http://www.w3.org/2012/04/10-dnt-minutes>. It’s first in the section “Overview of the 5 Different Proposals”. I ma having a hard time working out why it wasn’t adopted, from looking at the minutes, or what the problems and objections were. Maybe people can remind us, if they remember. David Singer Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Wednesday, 6 August 2014 23:46:37 UTC