- From: Mike O'Neill <michael.oneill@baycloud.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 20:50:17 +0100
- To: "'David Singer'" <singer@apple.com>, "'Roy T. Fielding'" <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Cc: <rob@blaeu.com>, <public-tracking@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In Europe at least there could be some pressure for observance, especially if DPAs say that DNT: 0 is a valid way to signal consent as per R66 in the privacy directive or that DNT:1 overrides any implied consent. About 20% of European users already set it in their browsers and the legal environment in the EU means that cannot be ignored. > -----Original Message----- > From: David Singer [mailto:singer@apple.com] > Sent: 21 April 2014 19:23 > To: Roy T. Fielding > Cc: rob@blaeu.com; Mike O'Neill; public-tracking@w3.org (public- > tracking@w3.org) > Subject: Re: Issue-207 > > > On Apr 21, 2014, at 11:11 , Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com> wrote: > > > On Apr 21, 2014, at 7:12 AM, Rob van Eijk wrote: > > > >> Burying the explenation in a large text would not suffice in my view. > > > > Then don't bury it. > > > >> You can not expect the user to keep track of which company accepts his user > agent of choice, and which companies do not. Especially since there can be > more than just one reason why a syntactically valid user expression of choice > was disregarded. > > > > I don't expect them to. I don't expect a user to ever look at this > > field, or anything else in the protocol for that matter. I expect > > regulators to look at them, and the occasional automated spider or > > extension driven by someone with advocacy in mind. > > I think if we ever get to the point where the vast majority of servers implement > DNT, and the exceptions etc. are rare enough to be worth flagging, we might > start exposing them automatically to users, but right now, I tend to agree. It’ll > be users who ask for ‘privacy debugging mode’, advocates, regulators, and so > on, who look. > > > David Singer > Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (MingW32) Comment: Using gpg4o v3.2.42.4591 - http://www.gpg4o.de/ Charset: utf-8 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTVXYtAAoJEHMxUy4uXm2JgMMH/iLUz5nrf2GMcRt7TqjBP3sZ npkIGig69TctNCuA+FBnKikEcK3JxULA/i9GP+hZMTODoieiL5PZ7IEPR0ELgQAW qn55v+RJqnqDjrcs10udBxmXNAbHTdiYAK0U6rQ/z4AExnZmwkFuS1pxaL3jzbRV v834A/XY76ezW5xjaTP3MBzCZ6CK1oTCTL/rmwIeHyi+eqYJ6wGfwdsmipq3Ue+d nTDfNRMpbO4SyDQeaPz/0tK3dHLjrv+n8yQEl8zu9o1H+C5aA09fSHDXTBD4CDfj WzGNorUSqc7S4t6dxRMDfxk8RvYHpKWTdAh4bYyG0ZZ/mHtQSp8jqP2ZLAzpdP0= =3aOU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Monday, 21 April 2014 19:50:52 UTC