- From: David Wainberg <dwainberg@appnexus.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 11:53:46 -0400
- To: Jack Hobaugh <jack@networkadvertising.org>
- CC: "Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)" <mts-std@schunter.org>, "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <5230920A.3090503@appnexus.com>
The presence of the agenda item to discuss publication adds to the confusion about the dates. On 2013-09-11 11:46 AM, Jack Hobaugh wrote: > Isn't the deadline for feedback on the proposed plan September 13? > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Sep 11, 2013, at 11:37 AM, David Wainberg <dwainberg@appnexus.com > <mailto:dwainberg@appnexus.com>> wrote: > >> I wasn't aware of a deadline for comments regarding publication as a >> WD. Where was this deadline published? >> >> On 2013-09-11 11:35 AM, Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) wrote: >>> Hi David, >>> >>> thanks a lot for your input. >>> >>> Unfortunately, the deadline on comments has passed yesterday and >>> this snapshot is currently under submission for publication. >>> It should have sufficient disclaimers (I tried my best) and I would >>> appreciate your inputs for the next release that we will publish soon. >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> matthias >>> >>> >>> On 11/09/2013 15:41, David Wainberg wrote: >>>> Hi Matthias, >>>> >>>> On 2013-09-05 7:35 AM, Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) wrote: >>>>> 6. Publication of the current editor's draft as a working draft: >>>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/drafts/tracking-compliance.html >>>>> I have asked our editors to >>>>> - insert a disclaimer that this is only the current >>>>> starting point of our >>>>> discussion and that the text is not consensus of the >>>>> group. >>>>> - to list the issues currently open >>>>> - Indicating that more issues can be raised until October 02. >>>>> Discussion (you may email before the call, too): >>>>> What are additional concrete changes to the text that are >>>>> essential before we publish? >>>> In my view, we're not ready to publish this as a Working Draft. >>>> There are too many open issues and questions about the process >>>> going forward. According to W3C process, publication of a Working >>>> Draft is an indication to the world at large that the doc is >>>> approaching last call and is ready for broad public review. I don't >>>> think we're there yet. I would ask that we hold on doing this until >>>> things settle a bit. >>>> >>>> Much thanks. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> David >>> >>
Received on Wednesday, 11 September 2013 15:54:13 UTC