W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > September 2013

Re: Agenda for the Sept 11 call (V01)

From: Chris Mejia <chris.mejia@iab.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 15:48:59 +0000
To: Jack Hobaugh <jack@networkadvertising.org>, David Wainberg <dwainberg@appnexus.com>
CC: "Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)" <mts-std@schunter.org>, "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CE55DED9.39A8F%chris.mejia@iab.net>
Yes, it's the 13th (this Friday), per Matthias's email:

>From Matthias on Sept. 6th:

Hi Team,

I now realized that it is wiser to open the poll after announcing the final plan.
I thus shifted the opening to Sept 19 and added an "important date" (for me) to publish the plan on Sept 18.


    September 13: Deadline for feedback on the proposed plan
    September 18 (new): Revised plan is announced
    September 18 (updated): Poll opens
    October 02: Issue Freeze: Issues raised after October 02 will be deferred to be addressed after Last Call.
     October 09: The poll closes; chairs and team assess responses.

Chris Mejia | Digital Supply Chain Solutions | Ad Technology Group | Interactive Advertising Bureau - IAB

From: Jack Hobaugh - NAI <jack@networkadvertising.org<mailto:jack@networkadvertising.org>>
Date: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 8:46 AM
To: David Wainberg <dwainberg@appnexus.com<mailto:dwainberg@appnexus.com>>
Cc: Matthias Schunter - WC3 WG Co-Chair <mts-std@schunter.org<mailto:mts-std@schunter.org>>, W3C DNT Working Group Mailing List <public-tracking@w3.org<mailto:public-tracking@w3.org>>
Subject: Re: Agenda for the Sept 11 call (V01)
Resent-From: W3C DNT Working Group Mailing List <public-tracking@w3.org<mailto:public-tracking@w3.org>>
Resent-Date: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 8:47 AM

Isn't the deadline for feedback on the proposed plan September 13?

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 11, 2013, at 11:37 AM, David Wainberg <dwainberg@appnexus.com<mailto:dwainberg@appnexus.com>> wrote:

I wasn't aware of a deadline for comments regarding publication as a WD. Where was this deadline published?

On 2013-09-11 11:35 AM, Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) wrote:
Hi David,

thanks a lot for your input.

Unfortunately, the deadline on comments has passed yesterday and this snapshot is currently under submission for publication.
It should have sufficient disclaimers (I tried my best) and I would appreciate your inputs for the next release that we will publish soon.


On 11/09/2013 15:41, David Wainberg wrote:
Hi Matthias,

On 2013-09-05 7:35 AM, Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) wrote:
6. Publication of the current editor's draft as a working draft:
    I have asked our editors to
        - insert a disclaimer that this is only the current starting point of our
            discussion and that the text is not consensus of the group.
        - to list the issues currently open
        - Indicating that more issues can be raised until October 02.
   Discussion (you may email before the call, too):
   What are additional concrete changes to the text that are essential before we publish?
In my view, we're not ready to publish this as a Working Draft. There are too many open issues and questions about the process going forward. According to W3C process, publication of a Working Draft is an indication to the world at large that the doc is approaching last call and is ready for broad public review. I don't think we're there yet. I would ask that we hold on doing this until things settle a bit.

Much thanks.


Received on Wednesday, 11 September 2013 15:50:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 3 November 2017 21:45:18 UTC