Re: Agenda for the Sept 11 call (V01)

Hi Folks,

thanks for the feedback.

You are correct, the review /feedback on "the plan" is still open and I 
am expecting feedback / comments before September 13.

We are required to regularily (every 3 months) report to the public what 
we currently discuss as a working draft.
This has been neglected in the past.  Unless stated otherwise, these 
documents do not document consensus and may radically change anytime.

I asked for objection to publishing the document (with 1/2 page of 
disclaimers) and received none. I therefore shipped the current text 
(with disclaimers).

Sorry for the confusion. I still appreciate your inputs and we can 
easily publish an improved WD as soon as possible after having addressed 
your inputs.


Regards,
matthias


On 11/09/2013 16:44, Shane M Wiley wrote:
>
> Matthias,
>
> As a reminder, the deadline was extended to this Friday due to Rosh 
> Hashanah last week.
>
> - Shane
>
> *From:*Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) 
> [mailto:mts-std@schunter.org]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 11, 2013 8:35 AM
> *To:* David Wainberg
> *Cc:* public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)
> *Subject:* Re: Agenda for the Sept 11 call (V01)
>
> Hi David,
>
> thanks a lot for your input.
>
> Unfortunately, the deadline on comments has passed yesterday and this 
> snapshot is currently under submission for publication.
> It should have sufficient disclaimers (I tried my best) and I would 
> appreciate your inputs for the next release that we will publish soon.
>
>
> Regards,
> matthias
>
> On 11/09/2013 15:41, David Wainberg wrote:
>
>     Hi Matthias,
>
>     On 2013-09-05 7:35 AM, Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) wrote:
>
>         6. Publication of the current editor's draft as a working draft:
>         http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/drafts/tracking-compliance.html
>             I have asked our editors to
>                 - insert a disclaimer that this is only the current
>         starting point of our
>                     discussion and that the text is not consensus of
>         the group.
>                 - to list the issues currently open
>                 - Indicating that more issues can be raised until
>         October 02.
>            Discussion (you may email before the call, too):
>            What are additional concrete changes to the text that are
>         essential before we publish?
>
>     In my view, we're not ready to publish this as a Working Draft.
>     There are too many open issues and questions about the process
>     going forward. According to W3C process, publication of a Working
>     Draft is an indication to the world at large that the doc is
>     approaching last call and is ready for broad public review. I
>     don't think we're there yet. I would ask that we hold on doing
>     this until things settle a bit.
>
>     Much thanks.
>
>     Regards,
>
>     David
>