- From: Dan Auerbach <dan@eff.org>
- Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 10:55:23 -0700
- To: public-tracking@w3.org
- Message-ID: <51508F8B.5040206@eff.org>
Hi Ronan, I'm unclear as to why you can't periodically push the OOBC users to the front-end servers, enabling a fast lookup. How many OOBC users do you have? Can you discuss details of how the front-end server and logging pipelines each work? We certainly don't want to ask something that's impossible, but on the flip side, it is reasonable to expect some amount of re-engineering to comply with DNT. To figure out which situation we are in, providing more details would be necessary. I also agree with others that using in-band mechanisms seems like a good solution. Cheers, Dan On 03/24/2013 03:53 PM, Ronan Heffernan wrote: > Mike, > > I'm sorry if I wasn't clear. I was proposing that whatever level of > de-identification, unlinkability, "munging", etc., that would apply to > any other DNT:1 data would apply to this data (for those users for > whom an out-of-band consent cannot be found) after the OOBC > determination is made or as soon as the window (48-hours?) for making > that determination expires, whichever comes first. I do not intend > for any other permitted retention or permitted use, from other > provisions in the spec to be made any more or any less stringent by > the non-real-time OOBC-detection mechanism. > > --ronan > > > > On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Mike O'Neill > <michael.oneill@baycloud.com <mailto:michael.oneill@baycloud.com>> wrote: > > Hi Ronan, > > > > If you said that the collected data would be de-identified and > also made unlinkable i.e. the identifiers were transparently > deleted immediately after collection (or maybe after a short time > to filter out multiple visits and detect unique visitors), then > that would work in my opinion (if you cannot get explicit > consent). But the unlinkability is important because that goes to > the essence of Do Not Track. > > > > Mike > > > > -- Dan Auerbach Staff Technologist Electronic Frontier Foundation dan@eff.org 415 436 9333 x134
Received on Monday, 25 March 2013 17:55:53 UTC