I'm sorry, I thought that we were scrapping "L" in favor of "D"
("disallowed"?). Whatever symbol we use to indicate that there will be a
later determination is fine. However, if you use "C" for "conditional"
instead of "C" for "consent", then are you scrapping all real-time consent
detection? I am not opposed to real-time consent detection, for those
systems where it is possible, and would not suggest that we make it
impossible for a server to signal that it has definitely detected an OOBC.
--ronan
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
> Ronan,****
>
> ** **
>
> The working group appeared to agree to use the “L” for not listening based
> on this week’s call (“!” will be used to signal something different). How
> about stick with “C” but name it “Conditional” with a resource link to
> explain what that means in your context?****
>
> ** **
>
> - Shane
>
Received on Friday, 22 March 2013 17:00:35 UTC