- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 10:15:36 +0100
- To: JC Cannon <jccannon@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Jeffrey Chester <jeff@democraticmedia.org>, Chris Pedigo <CPedigo@online-publishers.org>, "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>, "ifette@google.com" <ifette@google.com>, David Singer <singer@apple.com>
On Wednesday 20 March 2013 23:24:51 JC Cannon wrote: > As DNT does not apply to 1st-parties, This is an easy abbreviation, but it is wrong. DNT applies to first parties. They can't share. And all practices I hear invoked require to share an ID at some point in time. offline - online data: I think nobody seriously proposes to collect personal data online, turn off the network and share then. But on the other hand, only the collected data (under DNT:1) is subject to the no-sharing limitation. So an in-house combination of pre-existing (offline/online) data at the first party can be combined. The current problem the DPAs have with Google's unifying privacy approach over all services is out of scope for DNT IMHO. --Rigo
Received on Thursday, 21 March 2013 09:16:17 UTC