Jeff,
Could you map out the scenario as you see it happening? It sounds like you are mixing two issues.
1. Are you stating that a 1st party cannot use 3rd party data in real-time, that is not impacted by DNT, for personalization?
2. Are you stating that during an offline state that a 1st party cannot perform data append? There is DNT signal at that point.
Regards,
JC
From: Jeffrey Chester [mailto:jeff@democraticmedia.org]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 12:41 PM
To: Chris Pedigo
Cc: Rigo Wenning; public-tracking@w3.org; ifette@google.com; David Singer
Subject: Re: DNT:1 and "data append"
3rd data append companies bundle huge data sets that include public information, but also proprietary information. Offline is also integrated with online as well. I don't think (in the US) there is serious consent to the current state of data append. This is not out of scope for a robust DNT spec.
Jeffrey Chester
Center for Digital Democracy
1621 Connecticut Ave, NW, Suite 550
Washington, DC 20009
www.democraticmedia.org<http://www.democraticmedia.org>
www.digitalads.org<http://www.digitalads.org>
202-986-2220
On Mar 20, 2013, at 3:35 PM, Chris Pedigo wrote:
Again, under the current framework of our standard, first parties will not be able to share data with each other about DNT:1 users. And, third parties will not be able to collect any data about DNT:1 users. You are proposing to restrict first parties from acquiring data that is publicly available, collected with consent or offline data. This is out of scope for DNT.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeffrey Chester [mailto:jeff@democraticmedia.org]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 2:57 PM
To: Rigo Wenning
Cc: public-tracking@w3.org<mailto:public-tracking@w3.org>; Chris Pedigo; ifette@google.com<mailto:ifette@google.com>; David Singer
Subject: Re: DNT:1 and "data append"
First parties now engage in data append with many, many data partners for targeting. It's a common practice and should not be permitted when a user signals DNT.