- From: Jonathan Mayer <jmayer@stanford.edu>
- Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 10:04:31 -0700
- To: Peter Swire <peter@peterswire.net>
- Cc: "<public-tracking@w3.org> Working Group" <public-tracking@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAFTK4k=pmBXZa6NpDKjaGqp-S75bmW=Yws62t9pPpiRMWrTKFA@mail.gmail.com>
Regrets, finals week. Ugh. Jonathan On Tuesday, March 19, 2013, Peter Swire wrote: > > Wednesday call March 20, 2013**** > > **** > > ---------------------------**** > > Administrative**** > > **** > > Chair: Peter Swire**** > > ---------------------------**** > > **** > > 1. Confirmation of scribe – glad to accept volunteer in advance**** > > **** > > 2. Offline-caller-identification: **** > > If you intend to join the phone call, you must either associate your phone > number with your IRC username once you've joined the call (command: "Zakim, > [ID] is [name]" e.g., "Zakim, ??P19 is schunter" in my case), or let Nick > know your phone number ahead of time. If you are not comfortable with the > Zakim IRC syntax for associating your phone number, please email your name > and phone number to npdoty@w3.org <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > 'npdoty@w3.org');>. We want to reduce (in fact, eliminate) the time spent > on the call identifying phone numbers. Note that if your number is not > identified and you do not respond to off-the-phone reminders via IRC, you > will be dropped from the call.**** > > ** ** > > 3. Update on next face-to-face on May 6 to 8 near San Francisco.**** > > ** ** > > ---------------------------**** > > Compliance Spec: Peter Swire**** > > ---------------------------**** > > ** ** > > 4. Process for developing agenda for a Wednesday discussion of user > education and user interface. Likely call on the topic for April 10, > with initial proposed agenda items by the end of March.**** > > ** ** > > 5. Compliance spec procedure: “pending review” and “closed” issues. Numerous > people have highlighted the dependencies within the compliance spec – > willingness to reach agreement on one issue depends on the resolution of > other issues. In light of the relative difficulty of stakeholders > agreeing that an issue is actually “closed,” the Chair’s proposed idea is > to have “pending review” mean roughly “the text is stable and there is no > other specific text on the table, so it would require an affirmative > proposal that gains significant support for the issue to be brought up > again for discussion.” Assuming that we go forward with this approach, > the editors would work on a new public draft, with clear labeling of what > issues are closed, pending review, open, or raised. **** > > ** ** > > 6. ISSUE-25, Audience Measurement. Kathy Joe and her group have > submitted a substantially revised proposal for audience measurement. In > addition, we have provided an attached document that collects prior text > and links about market research, as well as the DAA text.**** > > ** ** > > 7. ACTION-371: De-identification. There has been considerable traffic > on the list about this topic. Dan Auerbach has drafted text.**** > > ** ** > > 8. ACTION-372, service providers and debugging. David Wainberg has > submitted text, with Jonathan Mayer comments on the list. Nick – please > open an ISSUE for this.**** > > ** ** > > 9. ACTION-373, append. John Simpson has proposed text. Aleecia > MacDonald has said her text will be ready for next week’s call.**** > > **** > > ---------------------------**** > > TPE: Matthias Schunter **** > > ---------------------------**** > > **** > > 10. We will aim to hold time this week so Matthias can begin addressing > these issues:**** > > ** ** > > ISSUE-112:**** > > http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/112**** > > - During the face2face we agreed to use cookie-like matching rules for**** > > sub-domains**** > > The goal is to re-use the cookie matchingenging in the UA**** > > - Question: Do we need any changes to the spec? If yes, who volunteers**** > > to do/propose those changes?**** > > ** ** > > ISSUE-163:**** > > http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/163**** > > - We discussed that sites who do not follow the DNT preference**** > > for some (unspecified) reason can signal so using "!".**** > > Examples include testing, technical problems, or any other reason.**** > > - David proposed corresponding text in ACTION-366**** > > - I would like to gather feedback on this text**** > > and understand whether it is OK to introduce this text into the spec.** > ** > > ** ** > > ISSUE-137:**** > > http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/137**** > > - We had disagreement whether a service provider MUST signal its**** > > presence or not.**** > > - David (ACTION-357) suggested that this debate is no longer applicable*** > * > > and that the concerns have been resolved:**** > > http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/actions/357**** > > - I would like to gather feedback on this text and understand whether**** > > people agree with David.**** > > ** ** > > ISSUE-164: To what extent should the "same-party" attribute of tracking*** > * > > status resource be required**** > > http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/164**** > > Rigo proposed text:**** > > http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/actions/258**** > > I would like to gather feedback and understand whether we can move**** > > forward based on this text.**** > > ** ** > > ---------------------------**** > > **** > > Preview of March 27 call**** > > **** > > ---------------------------**** > > **** > > 11. In the first half hour of next week’s call, we will have Rena Mears > and another expert brief us on issues related to the financial auditing > permitted use. Until recently Rena was the global lead of the Privacy > and Data Protection group at Deloitte and Touche. For the compliance > discussion, likely discussion of append, among other issues.**** > > **** > > ---------------------------**** > > **** > > 12. Announce next meeting & adjourn**** > > **** > > **** > > ================ Infrastructure =================**** > > **** > > Zakim teleconference bridge:**** > > VoIP: sip:zakim@voip.w3.org**** > > Phone +1.617.761.6200 passcode TRACK (87225)**** > > IRC Chat: irc.w3.org, port 6665, #dnt**** > > **** > **** > > > Professor Peter P. Swire > C. William O'Neill Professor of Law > Ohio State University > 240.994.4142 > www.peterswire.net > >> >> >> >> >> >> >
Received on Tuesday, 19 March 2013 17:05:06 UTC