- From: Jonathan Mayer <jmayer@stanford.edu>
- Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 10:03:58 -0700
- To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Cc: David Wainberg <david@networkadvertising.org>, "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAFTK4kkB3qKU4sC8jKvXaL0HDFBkf9xPXJva4DJ3AqgAoAU5jw@mail.gmail.com>
Roy and David, I regrettably don't have time for yet another go-round on debugging owing to finals week. It appears we'll soon have a fresh ISSUE for tracking the longstanding proposals and objections. Jonathan On Tuesday, March 19, 2013, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > By their very nature, most service providers collect data for > multiple parties via a centralized service. The data is > only separated after the protocol stream is parsed, which is > fairly immediate. Debugging will occur on both sides of that > separation process and is permitted by each controller as part > of the typical service contract. > > ....Roy > > On Mar 18, 2013, at 10:32 PM, Jonathan Mayer wrote: > > I would be willing to consider a debugging exception (for both third > parties and service providers), but only if: > > 1) Data collection is not prospective. In other words, the exception only > applies if there's currently a bug getting worked out. Industry > participants have not provided technical evidence that historical linkable > data would be essential for debugging unlinkable practices, and at any > rate, I'm not comfortable with any provision that allows continuous > linkable data collection. > > 2) Data collection is necessary. There are many ways of squishing a bug. > Collecting intrusive data must be a last resort. > > I think Tom Lowenthal's language in ACTION-278 mostly does #1, not quite > #2. At any rate, we should probably have an ISSUE for tracking a debugging > exception. > > On Monday, March 18, 2013 at 3:04 PM, David Wainberg wrote: > > The issue is that service providers should not jeopardize service > provider status by virtue of looking across siloed data to perform system > debugging. I believe the current language for the debug permitted use > already implicitly includes this, but that we can make it explicit in > non-normative language. > > Current permitted use: > > *6.1.1.2.7 Debugging** > ** > **Information may be collected, retained and used for identifying and > repairing errors that impair existing intended functionality.* > > Non-normative addition: > > *This provision includes use of data by service providers **from across > multiple clients simultaneously for the limited purpose of system > debugging. * > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 19 March 2013 17:04:33 UTC