- From: Ronan Heffernan <ronansan@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 08:42:24 -0400
- To: "Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)" <mts-std@schunter.org>
- Cc: public-tracking@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 19 March 2013 12:43:12 UTC
Matthias, You said that we now have 4 cases, but you seem to have only delineated 3 cases. I think there is the fourth case: The site uses out-of-band consent but the user cannot see or manage that consent via a control link, and the site promises to respect it. Was that the fourth case that you envisioned? --ronan On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) < mts-std@schunter.org> wrote: > Hi! > > > for consent, we now have 4 cases: > 1. The site has in-band consent (=DNT;0 either as a preference or an > exception) > 2. The site is reasonably certain that it has out of band consent > 3. The site uses out of band consent and a user can see (and maybe manage) > this out of band consent via "control" link > and the site promises to respect it > > I believe this translates into two qualifiers: > C = I obtained consent (either in-band or out-of-band) > c = I will handle your data according to the out of band consent that > you can retrieve via "control" > (in this case, the control link is mandatory). > > If browsers care, they can differentiate the cases (1) and (2) by means of > the fact whether they have sent a DNT;0 or not. > > > Does this sound like an appropriate resolution? > > > Regards, > matthias > >
Received on Tuesday, 19 March 2013 12:43:12 UTC