Re: Batch closing of issues (ISSUE-144, ISSUE-187) [pls Respond by Mar 22]

On ISSUE-187, have we reached agreement on a consent standard for exceptions under the new model?  If not, I don't believe we've resolved the concerns about a race to the bottom that Nick, I, and others have raised.


On Monday, March 18, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) wrote:

> Hi Team,
> 
> based on our discussion at the Cambridge F2F and exchanges by email, I 
> suggest to close the following issues.
> 
> Please respond if you disagree with closing one of those issues while 
> substantiating your concerns.
> 
> Regards,
> matthias
> 
> --------------------------------
> ISSUE-144: User-granted Exceptions: Constraints on user agent behavior 
> while granting and for future requests?
> http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/144
> 
> The new approach to exceptions has removed those requirements on the 
> user agent. As a consequence, I believe we can close this issue.
> 
> Note: The related question whether a user agent MUST/SHOULD/MAY 
> implement the exception API is still under discussion as ISSUE-151.
> 
> --------------------------------
> ISSUE-187: What is the right approach to exception handling?
> http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/187
> 
> During the F2F, we reconfirmed that the recent improvements
> (e.g., proposed by Nick and Jonathan) improved the new exception 
> approach sufficiently such that it seems likely that the whole
> group can now live with it. I suggest to close ISSUE-187.
> ----------------------------------
> 
>