- From: Elizabeth Coker <liz.coker@comcast.net>
- Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 09:16:07 -0600
- To: <public-tracking@w3.org>
- CC: Julie Brill <jbrill@ftc.gov>
- Message-ID: <CD64A2D7.13F1C%liz.coker@comcast.net>
Dear TPWG Members: I want to direct everyone's attention to this WSJ article <http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB1000142412788732409640457835453301095 8940-lMyQjAxMTAzMDEwMTExNDEyWj.html> that highlights the issues with "first" and "third" parties. While a technical standard must be implemented, it should be consistent with consumer expectations, not warped into something that continues to obfuscate data collection from consumer, publisher and advertiser scrutiny. Privacy preference management is typically assumed to be between the consumer and the website (or brand) by most people. Only highly informed individuals realize that every time they "click" on something they could be dealing with a "new" first party and that their data may now be collected by some unknown entity even though their intent was not to share, or only to share with the trusted brand or site. I am a marketer and I understand the implications of this kind of change, as do other marketers as noted in this recent AdExchanger article <http://www.adexchanger.com/data-driven-thinking/please-track-me/> . Marketing will adapt it always has. I hope you will incorporate this reality into the final standard, as it represents a key issue driving the need for a DNT standard. We are only at this point and requiring a standard because one small, but powerful group of marketers is hiding behind the tech and not treating the collection and distribution of people's personal information with respect. This is not new, and has been happening since long before the internet - with the selling of snail mail list for profit without the consumer's knowledge or consent. The consumer is not "the customer" of data aggregators, ad exchanges, ad networks or profiling companies. Their customers are the publishers/sites and advertisers who utilize these services. These companies care deeply about customer loyalty and their brands. They are becoming more aware of how their marketing data is collected and the risks it may cause their organizations. If their data management practices willingly or inadvertently undermine the trust they work so hard build with their customers, then the whole system comes crashing down and they'll simply find a different method for spending their ad dollars in a way that better supports their business objectives. Better to adapt in a controlled fashion than have it ripped out from under us. Thank you for your consideration as you work to bring this standard to conclusion, Liz Coker
Received on Tuesday, 12 March 2013 16:18:19 UTC