- From: Craig Spiezle <craigs@otalliance.org>
- Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 14:29:03 -0500
- To: "'Peter Swire'" <peter@peterswire.net>, <public-tracking@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <0c1801ce1b6a$078c4680$16a4d380$@otalliance.org>
Thank you for being the voice of reason and listening to all parties, large and small. From: Peter Swire [mailto:peter@peterswire.net] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2013 2:15 PM To: public-tracking@w3.org Subject: a bit more on charter extension To the Working Group: The topic of charter extension came up today at the Do Not Track panel at the IAPP Summit. I thought I would pass on my comments to the full group. On the topic of user interface, the Charter states that “the Working Group will not specify the exact presentation to the user.” Reading the language as a lawyer, “not specify the exact presentation” leaves considerable room to talk about issues of user interface. My general approach is to have an open door, meet with people, and consider how to foster a useful conversation. I apply that to discussions of user interface as well. If I can be useful to helping convene discussions, including browsers, advertisrs, and others, I am open to that, and I know that W3C staff would be happy to help with that. Perhaps of interest, Stu Ingis of DAA said at the panel that the charter extension is a “distraction.” As I said in my earlier email to the group about the charter appeal, we have work to do. Letıs do it on the timetable that we contemplated when I came aboard. Best, Peter Professor Peter P. Swire C. William O'Neill Professor of Law Ohio State University 240.994.4142 www.peterswire.net
Received on Thursday, 7 March 2013 19:29:32 UTC