Re: Edited Draft for Considerations

I think NAI/DAA/DMA are the formal submitters, but agree that several
contributed.

From:  Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>
Date:  Wednesday, June 26, 2013 12:26 PM
To:  "Edward W. Felten" <felten@cs.princeton.edu>
Cc:  "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Subject:  RE: Edited Draft for Considerations
Resent-From:  <public-tracking@w3.org>
Resent-Date:  Wed, 26 Jun 2013 16:27:44 +0000

> #1 ­ Yes (was trying to send it before noon but we were having technical
> difficulties)
> #2 ­ NAI is the formal submitter but they have many ³co-authors² that agree
> with the substance but I¹m not sure if it¹s necessary to list all of them out.
>  
> - Shane
>  
> 
> From: Edward W. Felten [mailto:felten@cs.princeton.edu]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 9:15 AM
> To: Shane Wiley
> Cc: public-tracking@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Edited Draft for Considerations
>  
> 
> Just to clarify:
> 
>  
> 
> (1) Is this proposing specific language for adoption in the June draft, in
> response to Peter's call for specific proposals by June 26?
> 
> (2) If so, who is proposing it?
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
> 
> Apologies ­ you may receive this from several individuals as we¹re having
> issues sending the email to the public list.
>  
> The attached edited draft represents industry discussion but not consensus as
> we didn¹t have enough time to coordinate a full review of initial thoughts.
> Please see these as directional correct but with some room for word-smithing.
>  
> Thank you,
> - Shane
> 
> 
>  
> -- 
> Edward W. Felten
> Professor of Computer Science and Public Affairs
> Director, Center for Information Technology Policy
> Princeton University
> 609-258-5906           http://www.cs.princeton.edu/~felten