Re: Edited Draft for Considerations

Is there a more user friendly way of determining what those specific language changes are?  A redline, perhaps?

On Jun 26, 2013, at 12:26 PM, Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:

> #1 – Yes (was trying to send it before noon but we were having technical difficulties)
> #2 – NAI is the formal submitter but they have many “co-authors” that agree with the substance but I’m not sure if it’s necessary to list all of them out.
>  
> - Shane
>  
> From: Edward W. Felten [mailto:felten@cs.princeton.edu] 
> Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 9:15 AM
> To: Shane Wiley
> Cc: public-tracking@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Edited Draft for Considerations
>  
> Just to clarify:
>  
> (1) Is this proposing specific language for adoption in the June draft, in response to Peter's call for specific proposals by June 26?
> (2) If so, who is proposing it?
>  
>  
> 
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
> Apologies – you may receive this from several individuals as we’re having issues sending the email to the public list.
>  
> The attached edited draft represents industry discussion but not consensus as we didn’t have enough time to coordinate a full review of initial thoughts.  Please see these as directional correct but with some room for word-smithing.
>  
> Thank you,
> - Shane
> 
> 
>  
> -- 
> Edward W. Felten
> Professor of Computer Science and Public Affairs
> Director, Center for Information Technology Policy
> Princeton University                
> 609-258-5906           http://www.cs.princeton.edu/~felten