- From: Ronan Heffernan <ronansan@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 07:10:03 -0400
- To: Jonathan Mayer <jmayer@stanford.edu>
- Cc: "public-tracking@w3.org Group WG" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 26 June 2013 11:10:52 UTC
It is better to transparently notify a user that they are using a non-compliant UA whose DNT signal will be ignored, than for companies to decide to not implement DNT. --ronan On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 2:54 AM, Jonathan Mayer <jmayer@stanford.edu> wrote: > I would propose we add this text: > > A website MUST NOT disregard a syntactically valid DNT signal. > > Example: A website believes that a DNT: 1 signal originates from a > noncompliant browser. The website must not disregard the signal. It may > request confirmation of the user's preference through an out-of-band > consent mechanism. > > >
Received on Wednesday, 26 June 2013 11:10:52 UTC