There will be a need to perform OOBC that does not interact with the UGE mechanism, but it might be possible for us to define an *optional* way for those mechanisms to work together where possible. In general I think that trying to manage out-of-band consent with any in-band mechanism is a bad idea, but I could be wrong. --ronan On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: > Rigo, > > Could you please opine on the proposal to allow OOBC to be recorded in the > UGE registry with a pointer to the control mechanism? This appears to be > the middle ground that would give users a consolidated place to view > exceptions/OOBC and have direct links to exercise their choices. This is > NOT equating UGE to OOBC - but does give users centralized control. > Thoughts? > > - Shane >
Received on Tuesday, 18 June 2013 21:47:58 UTC