- From: Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:59:02 +0000
- To: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>, "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>
- CC: "Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)" <mts-std@schunter.org>, "Rob van Eijk" <rob@blaeu.com>
Rigo, Could you please opine on the proposal to allow OOBC to be recorded in the UGE registry with a pointer to the control mechanism? This appears to be the middle ground that would give users a consolidated place to view exceptions/OOBC and have direct links to exercise their choices. This is NOT equating UGE to OOBC - but does give users centralized control. Thoughts? - Shane -----Original Message----- From: Rigo Wenning [mailto:rigo@w3.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 1:19 AM To: public-tracking@w3.org Cc: Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation); Rob van Eijk Subject: Re: Batch closing of TPE related issues On Monday 10 June 2013 14:39:48 Matthias Schunter wrote: > Do I understand you correctly that > - you are concerned if UGEs are translated into out of band > exceptions? Matthias, have you ever tried to revoke your consent or to opt out of one of those ridiculous UK ICO cookie banners? I think that a UGE MUST NOT be translated into OOBC, a user MUST be able to revoke UGE by deleting the exception in the store. The whole point of DNT is a centralized opt-out in the browser. This means Shane's local duplication is meaningless. It may only serve as a memory for some historical state, but MUST NOT overwrite the status of the UGE store in the browser. Otherwise the exercise is futile because Johnny can't opt out anymore. --Rigo
Received on Tuesday, 18 June 2013 17:00:06 UTC