- From: Alan Chapell <achapell@chapellassociates.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 08:28:25 -0400
- To: Nicholas Doty <npdoty@w3.org>
- CC: Peter Swire <peter@peterswire.net>, "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CDE47922.3343F%achapell@chapellassociates.com>
Ok Thanks Nick. Alan From: Nicholas Doty <npdoty@w3.org> Date: Thursday, June 13, 2013 9:30 PM To: Alan Chapell <achapell@chapellassociates.com> Cc: Peter Swire <peter@peterswire.net>, "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org> Subject: Re: June Draft of the DNT compliance spec > Hi Alan, > > On Jun 10, 2013, at 6:30 AM, Alan Chapell <achapell@chapellassociates.com> > wrote: > >> Thanks Peter. I'm still generally uncomfortable that DNT doesn't place >> requirements on First Parties. >> >> One item of particular concern that seems to have fallen off the radar is the >> scenario where a party collects data in a first party context and attempts to >> use it in a third party context when DNT is enabled. I thought there was >> agreement on this issue. However, I keep raising it, and it doesn't seem to >> make it into the drafts. Perhaps its implied in the language "Š customize the >> content, services, and advertising in the context of the first party >> experience." However, it is not clear enough, IMHO. >> >> To address, I offer the following language to Section 4 (First Party >> Compliance). The new language is below. >> >> First Parties must not use data collected while a First Party when acting as >> a Third-Party when DNT = 1. >> >> Nick if I need to open up another issue on this, please let me know. >> Thanks! > > We have ISSUE-170: "Definition of and what/whether limitations around data > append and first parties" open as the issue tracking this question. I believe > the group does not have agreement on this issue, which is why it is one of the > several OPEN issues post our recent cleanup. > > Thanks, > Nick
Received on Monday, 17 June 2013 12:29:04 UTC