- From: Alan Chapell <achapell@chapellassociates.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 08:00:36 -0400
- To: Jeffrey Chester <jeff@democraticmedia.org>, Peter Swire <peter@peterswire.net>
- CC: Jonathan Mayer <jmayer@stanford.edu>, David Singer <singer@apple.com>, "public-tracking@w3.org Group WG" <public-tracking@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CDE471D3.33423%achapell@chapellassociates.com>
Thanks Jeff. I'd like to see us continue to work diligently towards a last call document next month. The June document circulated by Peter is a good start, but we've got a lot of work in front of us to address outstanding issues. Alan From: Jeffrey Chester <jeff@democraticmedia.org> Date: Friday, June 14, 2013 8:30 AM To: Peter Swire <peter@peterswire.net> Cc: Jonathan Mayer <jmayer@stanford.edu>, David Singer <singer@apple.com>, "public-tracking@w3.org Group WG" <public-tracking@w3.org> Subject: Re: A Contingency Plan for Winding Up the Working Group Resent-From: <public-tracking@w3.org> Resent-Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 12:31:09 +0000 > Peter: > > I agree with Jonathan. I fear we are not meeting the expectations that global > users had for a meaningful way to reduce some of the data collection and > tracking which is at the core of the online marketing business model (let > alone the NSA!) > > While I remain committed to further discussion, it is clear there will likely > be no meaningful agreement to protect user privacy (even in the very limited > context we have addressed). > > > Jeff > > Center for Digital Democracy > 1621 Connecticut Ave, NW, Suite 550 > Washington, DC 20009 > www.democraticmedia.org <http://www.democraticmedia.org> > www.digitalads.org <http://www.digitalads.org> > 202-986-2220 > > On Jun 14, 2013, at 5:54 AM, Peter Swire wrote: > >> I am working with W3C colleagues to have an update about our thinking about >> process/schedule to you today. >> >> Peter >> >> Prof. Peter P. Swire >> C. William O'Neill Professor of Law >> Ohio State University >> 240.994.4142 >> www.peterswire.net <http://www.peterswire.net> >> >> Beginning August 2013: >> Nancy J. and Lawrence P. Huang Professor >> Law and Ethics Program >> Scheller College of Business >> Georgia Institute of Technology >> >> >> From: Jonathan Mayer <jmayer@stanford.edu> >> Date: Friday, June 14, 2013 1:53 AM >> To: David Singer <singer@apple.com> >> Cc: "public-tracking@w3.org Group WG" <public-tracking@w3.org> >> Subject: Re: A Contingency Plan for Winding Up the Working Group >> Resent-From: <public-tracking@w3.org> >> Resent-Date: Friday, June 14, 2013 1:54 AM >> >> >> David, >> >> Participants in the working group have frequently proposed agenda items and >> estimated consensus on issues. I'm not sure what would be different about >> evaluating and adopting a contingency plan. >> >> Moreover, there's working group precedent for contingency planning. Some >> time ago members of the group proposed tabling a component of our charter, >> Tracking Selection Lists, for lack of consensus. And we did. >> >> Best, >> Jonathan >> >> >> On Thursday, June 13, 2013 at 10:26 PM, David Singer wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> Sent from my iPad >>> >>> On Jun 13, 2013, at 9:19 PM, Jonathan Mayer <jmayer@stanford.edu> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Colleagues, >>>> >>>> We first met to discuss Do Not Track over 2 years ago. We have now held 10 >>>> in-person meetings and 78 conference calls. We have exchanged 7,148 emails. >>>> And those boggling figures reflect just the official fora. >>>> >>>> The group remains at an impasse. >>> >>> No, alas, that is what you would like to believe, and what you tell others. >>> >>> Determination of consensus, impasse, and alternative routes ahead are >>> primarily the responsibility of the chairs. It is perhaps kind of you to >>> assume their role, but there is still work remaining for us mere delegates >>> to do. >>> >>> Thanks, nonetheless >>> >>> >>>> We have sharpened issues, and we have made some progress on low-hanging >>>> fruit. But we still have not resolved our longstanding key disagreements, >>>> including: What information can websites collect, retain, and use? What >>>> sorts of user interfaces and defaults are compliant, and can websites >>>> ignore noncompliant browsers? >>>> >>>> Our Last Call deadline is July 2013. That due date was initially January >>>> 2012. Then April 2012. Then June 2012. Then October 2012. We are 18 months >>>> behind schedule, with no end in sight. >>>> >>>> There must come a stopping point. There must come a time when we agree to >>>> disagree. If we cannot reach consensus by next month, I believe we will >>>> have arrived at that time. >>>> >>>> I would make two proposals for next Wednesday's call. First, that we commit >>>> to not punting our July deadline. If we have not attained agreement on Last >>>> Call documents, we should wind up the working group. Second, that we begin >>>> planning a responsible contingency process for winding up the working group >>>> if we miss our deadline. >>>> >>>> Let me be clear: I am not proposing that we halt our work. I plan to >>>> continue collaborating in good faith right up until our deadline. I remain >>>> committed to Do Not Track as a uniform, persistent, easy-to-use, and >>>> effective control over collection of a consumer's browsing history. I >>>> believe a consensus Do Not Track standard is the best possible outcome for >>>> all stakeholders in the web ecosystem. But I also believe prudence dictates >>>> some planning for foreseeable alternative outcomes. >>>> >>>> Sincerely, >>>> Jonathan >>>> >>>> (Speaking only for himself, as usual.) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> >> >
Received on Monday, 17 June 2013 12:01:09 UTC