Re: Batch closing of TPE related issues (Deadline: June 12)

PS: Deadline for responses is June 12
On 04/06/2013 15:31, Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> enclosed is a list of TPE-related ISSUES that I believe can be closed.
> Please drop me a line if you disagree and believe that some of these 
> issues should be kept open.
>
> Thanks a lot!
>
> matthias
>
> -----------------
> ISSUE-112: How are sub-domains handled for site-specific exceptions?
> http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/112
> Resolution:
> - Cookie-like
> - As documented in the spec
>
> ISSUE-152: User Agent Compliance: feedback for out-of-band consent
> http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/152
> Resolution:
> - User agents (in the new model) are free to interact with users
> - We do not mandate that they do so
>
> ISSUE-167: Multiple site exceptions
> http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/167
> Resolution:
> - No special approach for multi-site exceptions
> - Based on implementation experience, we may later revisit the issue
>
> ISSUE-182: protocol for user agents to indicate whether a request with 
> DNT set is 1st party or 3rd party
> http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/182
> Resolution:
> - This seems technically impossible
> - As a consequence, I suggest to close
>
> ISSUE-192: Should exceptions have expiry date, secure flag or other 
> cookie-like attributes?
> http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/192
> Resolution:
> - User agents may expire exceptions (or use other mechanisms for 
> aligning them with user preference)
> - Suggestion: No additional management mechanisms; leave TPE spec as 
> it is
>
>
>
>
>
>

Received on Thursday, 6 June 2013 06:42:43 UTC