- From: Mike O'Neill <michael.oneill@baycloud.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 21:53:10 -0000
- To: "'Nicholas Doty'" <npdoty@w3.org>
- Cc: <public-tracking@w3.org>, <public-tracking-international@w3.org>
FYI I have put a video of a panel discussion from the recent Computers, Privacy & Data Protection Conference on the wiki. It clarifies the current EP amendments to the new Regulation covering pseudonymous (de-identified) data, consent and Do Not Track. Here is a link to the wiki: http://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/De-identification#Government_reports It might be a good idea to link to the wiki from our group home page, so it would be easier to find. Cheers Mike -----Original Message----- From: Nicholas Doty [mailto:npdoty@w3.org] Sent: 16 January 2013 08:05 To: Tracking Protection Working Group Subject: Re: tracking-ISSUE-191 (Descriptive DeID): Non-normative Discussion of De-Identification [Tracking Definitions and Compliance] On Jan 15, 2013, at 12:11 PM, "Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker" <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: > tracking-ISSUE-191 (Descriptive DeID): Non-normative Discussion of De-Identification [Tracking Definitions and Compliance] > > Major goals of these discussions include: (1) clarifying terminology related to de-identification/delinking; (2) identifying threat models that can result in re-identification; and (3) identifying the range of safeguards that can respond to such threats. > > This issue is related to Issue 188, the definition of unlink ability. The new issue is specifically not aimed at designing/debating normative language for the standard. It is focused on the logically prior endeavor of getting descriptive clarity. As suggested on the call last week (ACTION-347), I've set up a wiki page we can use to collect and annotate resources regarding de-identification: http://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/De-identification Anyone with a W3C account can edit this wiki page. (I've put it within the Privacy Interest Group wiki space rather than creating a separate one; de-identification resources are likely to be of use beyond just this WG.) I've collected the links Peter shared and a couple of academic papers, clearly just a starting point. Add others! -Nick
Received on Friday, 25 January 2013 21:53:44 UTC