Re: Agenda for 21 January 2012 TPE call - V03 (regrets)

Hi

I am fairly sure I will have to give regrets for today;  I am at an MPEG meeting and some late re-scheduling means I am chairing a session which will probably not finish in time.  If it does, I will do my best to call in, if late.

I'm sorry.  I will try to get responses/opinions to issues in email.  If there are issues for which I am the obvious victim for action, you should take advantage of my inability to object, though I'd like two weeks as I have a 3G meeting next week and might not be able to do actions fast.

On Jan 22, 2013, at 20:35 , Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) <mts-std@schunter.org> wrote:

> Hi Team,
> 
> V03: 
> - Corrected the date (sorry for the time-warp ;-)
> - Added some pointers to discusions on the mailing list
> - Added ISSUE-111 to the list of issues to be discussed
> 
> Regards,
> matthias
> 
> ---------------------------
> Administrative
> ---------------------------
> 
> 1.  Selection of scribe
> 
> ---------------------------
> Old business
> ---------------------------
> 
> 2.   Review of overdue action items:  http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/actions/overdue?sort=owne
> 
> 3. Offline-caller-identification: 
> If you intend to join the phone call, you must either associate your phone number with your IRC username once you've joined the call (command: "Zakim, [ID] is [name]" e.g., "Zakim, ??P19 is schunter" in my case), or let Nick know your phone number ahead of  time. If you are not comfortable with the Zakim IRC syntax for associating your phone number, please email your name and phone number to npdoty@w3.org by 8am PT tomorrow. We want to reduce (in fact, eliminate) the time spent on the call identifying phone numbers. Note that if your number is not identified and you do not respond to off-the-phone reminders via IRC, you will be dropped from the call.
> 
> 
> ---------------------------
> 4. ISSUES marked OPEN
> ---------------------------
> Goal: review open issues at https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/products/2
> and assign actions to them
> 
> ISSUE-153: What are the implications on software that changes requests but does not necessarily initiate them?
>     https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/153
>       Proposed text (by david and nick): "Software outside of the user agent that causes a DNT header to be sent (or modifies existing headers) MUST NOT 
>    do so without following the requirements of this section; such software is responsible for assuring the expressed preference reflects the user's intent."
> More input from David Wainberg and discussion by David Singer:
>  http://www.w3.org/mid/13C7BCD8-CE40-4D71-A06E-97F55128CBC4@apple.com>
> 
> 
> ISSUE-144: User-granted Exceptions: Constraints on user agent behavior while granting and for future requests?
> http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/144
> - Discussions: 
>     - Do we need any constraints on user agent behavior?
>     - If yes: 
>        - What specific constraints should we specify for user-granted exceptions
> - Related discussions (probably not during call but rather at the F2F):
>        - How can we "police" user agents?
>        - How to handle "non-compliant" user agents?
> - Response by David Singer: 
>   http://www.w3.org/mid/10DCB04C-30D0-43D2-BBDF-1672619C4016@apple.com
> 
> 
> ISSUE-137: Does hybrid tracking status need to distinguish between first party (1) and outsourcing service provider acting as a first party (s)
>  http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/137 
> - Roy (ACTION-354) plans to provide input on ISSUE-137.
> - David Singer: "Before you read all the long email, realize that Roy points out that the new first-party resource tells a system both (a) that my first-party is someone other than me, which is what the qualifier indicated, and (b) who that is, which the qualifier relied on something else for. So it may well be true (pending reading the text) that the qualifier is not needed."
> 
> ISSUE-111: Signaling state/existence of site-specific exceptions
> https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/111
> 
> As David Singer pointer out: Now that the new approach to exceptions  and the Javascript API is stabilising, we can revisit ISSUE-111 (which I changed from POSTPONED to OPEN)
> 
> 
> ---------------------------
> 5. ISSUES marked PENDING REVIEW
> ---------------------------
> 
> I have sent an email for batch closing of some ISSUES to the list.
> Please review and respond as needed.
>   
> ---------------------------
> 
> 6.  Announce next meeting & adjourn
> 
> ================ Infrastructure =================
> 
> Zakim teleconference bridge:
> VoIP:    sip:zakim@voip.w3.org
> Phone +1.617.761.6200 passcode TRACK (87225)
> IRC Chat: irc.w3.org, port 6665, #dnt
> 
> *****
> 

David Singer
Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.