- From: Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) <mts-std@schunter.org>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 09:47:55 +0100
- To: "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Hi Team, ISSUEs formalise specific questions under discussion in the group. In order to ensure that we are all on the same page and continue to operate smoothly, I would like to give some info/background on handling of ISSUES. Questions/feedback is welcome! Regards, matthias -------------------------------------------- STATE of an ISSUE: Each issue has a status that can be RAISED: Someone (anyone) believes that this is a topic to discuss OPEN: Questions/topics under active discussion PENDING_REVIEW: The discussion has concluded and a proposed resolution is on the table CLOSED: We accepted the proposed resolution POSTPONED: We decided not to discuss this issue at this point in time. GENERAL: 1. - Issues should usually only be closed if there is an documented proposal that does not trigger sustained and substantiated objections (i.e., everyone can live with this option). 2. - If this is not possible (i.e., none of the proposals is acceptable following point (1)), then the chairs may ask for input and decide [so far, we only needed executed (2) a single time] ON OBJECTIONS - Silence means agreement, i.e., if I ask for objections and nobody reponds, I assume agreement and consensus. - Please only speak for yourself/ your organisation: Do not send emails like "I believe that Joe objects". I am likely to ignore such emails in the future. [Note: It is OK to send wakeup emails behind the scenes ("hey joe, are you aware that Matthias is closing this issue")] - Try to substantiate your objection/concern and indicate what changes you would like to see CLOSING via EMAIL - If I attempt to close issues via Email, I send an explicit email asking whether anyone sustains and substantiates an objections (the emails usually saying "Batch closing...") - Usually, I only attempt this if I perceive sufficient agreement in the group (I may be wrong) - If you believe further discussion is needed or that I misrepresented the status of this issue, please respond. CLOSING at a F2F: - We may decide to close issues during F2F meetings - This will be reflected in the minutes - In the future, I will do a better job informing all participants (e.g., my an email saying that we decided to close issues A, B, C) Meaning of "CLOSED" - Once an ISSUE is CLOSED, we believe that we have resolved the question at hand - either by answering it or it became irrelevant - Usually, ISSUEs are only re-opened if we receive new information/insight - You can still provide new insight / input / observations to convince the group to re-open an issue.
Received on Wednesday, 23 January 2013 08:48:21 UTC